Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29052539›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology spectrum2017

Engineering Diagnostic and Therapeutic Gut Bacteria.

Brian P Landry, Jeffrey J Tabor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology spectrum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Living Microbial Drugs.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Current and emerging approaches to manage chronic inflammatory gut disorders.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian P LandryDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77030.
Jeffrey J TaborDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77030.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically engineered bacteria have the potential to diagnose and treat a wide range of diseases linked to the gastrointestinal tract, or gut. Such engineered microbes will be less expensive and invasive than current diagnostics and more effective and safe than current therapeutics. Recent advances in synthetic biology have dramatically improved the reliability with which bacteria can be engineered with the sensors, genetic circuits, and output (actuator) genes necessary for diagnostic and therapeutic functions. However, to deploy such bacteria

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenetic EngineeringAnimalsBacteriaBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBioreactorsBiosensing TechniquesGastrointestinal TractGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMicroorganisms, Genetically-ModifiedModels, AnimalNeoplasmsProbioticsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, Pharmacological

Identifiers

PMID29052539
PMCPMC11687543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.