Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29052450›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2018

Measuring the Implementation of Youth Empowerment Solutions.

Susan Morrel-Samuels, Laney A Rupp, Andria B Eisman, Alison L Miller, Sarah A Stoddard, Susan P Franzen, Peter Hutchison, Marc A Zimmerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program in US Urban Middle Schools Using a Multiple Baseline Experimental Design.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susan Morrel-Samuels1 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Laney A Rupp1 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Andria B Eisman1 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alison L Miller1 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sarah A Stoddard2 University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Susan P Franzen1 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Peter Hutchison1 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Marc A Zimmerman1 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Michigan Youth Violence Prevention Center Community Engagement and RevitalizationU01CE002698 · CE · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZIMMERMAN, MARC A · 2015 to 2020
$7.2M
Youth Empowerment Solutions for Positive Youth DevelopmentR01HD062565 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZIMMERMAN, MARC A · 2010 to 2014
$3.0M
NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002698NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD062565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scholars have increasingly emphasized the importance of using evidence-based programs to promote health and prevent disease. While theoretically and empirically based programs may be effective in carefully controlled conditions, many fail to achieve desired outcomes when implemented in real-world settings. Ensuring high-quality implementation of health promotion programs is critically important as variation in implementation is closely associated with program effectiveness. The purpose of this article is to present methods used to document and assess the implementation of the Youth Empowerment Solutions (YES) program. We collected process evaluation data on 25 YES groups from 12 schools over a period of 4 years. The evaluation assessed four key aspects of delivery: fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, and program quality. We found wide variations in delivery for some measures, while others were more consistent across groups. These indicators of program delivery provided a strong basis for evaluating program implementation, taking actions to improve it, and ultimately, deepening understanding of program effectiveness. The study suggests a model for using multiple methods to collect and analyze data about aspects of program delivery to guide future implementations.

Indexed as

Power, PsychologicalAdolescentChildHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansProcess Assessment, Health CareProgram EvaluationSchoolsStudentschild/adolescent healthcommunity interventionevaluation methodsprocess evaluationprogram planning and evaluationviolence prevention

Identifiers

PMID29052450
PMCPMC8404684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.