Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29052181›Full record

ReviewEndocrine2017

Probiotic strains and mechanistic insights for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Christiane S Hampe, Christian L Roth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Probiotic for Pancreatic β-Cell Function in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antidiabetic Effects ofNutrients · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mitochondria-Microbiota Interaction in Neurodegeneration.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christiane S HampeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. champe@u.washington.edu.
Christian L RothCenter for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Hospital & Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-4057
Seattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

ISLET CELL MEMBRANE ANTIBODIES IN DIABTESR01DK026190 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAMPE, CHRISTIANE S · 1986 to 2016
$4.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK026190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe intestinal microbial composition appears to differ between healthy controls and individuals with Type 2 diabetes (T2D). This observation has led to the hypothesis that perturbations of the intestinal microbiota may contribute to the development of T2D. Manipulations of the intestinal microbiota may therefore provide a novel approach in the prevention and treatment of T2D. Indeed, fecal transplants have shown promising results in both animal models for obesity and T2D and in human clinical trials. To avoid possible complications associated with fecal transplants, probiotics are considered as a viable alternative therapy. An important, however often underappreciated, characteristic of probiotics is that individual strains may have different, even opposing, effects on the host. This strain specificity exists also within the same species. A comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms at the strain level is therefore crucial for the selection of suitable probiotic strains. PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to discuss the mechanisms employed by specific probiotic strains of the Lactobacillus and the Bifidobacterium genuses, which showed efficacy in the treatment of obesity and T2D. Some probiotic strains employ recurring beneficial effects, including the production of anti-microbial lactic acid, while other strains display highly unique features, such as hydrolysis of tannins.

conclusionA major obstacle in the evaluation of probiotic strains lays in the great number of strains, differences in detection methodology and measured outcome parameters. The understanding of further research should be directed towards the development of standardized evaluation methods to facilitate the comparison of different studies.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumLactobacillusProbioticsAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansIntestinesIntestinal microbiotaObesityProbioticsStrain-specificityType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29052181
OpenAlexW2765695369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.