Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29052180›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2018

Effectiveness of myoinositol for polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liuting Zeng, Kailin Yang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Inositols in PCOS.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liuting ZengHunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, Hunan Province, China. 2057188405@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4654-8760
Kailin YangHunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, Hunan Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1442-8644
Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effectiveness and safety of myoinositol for patients with PCOS.

methodsIn this meta-analysis, data from randomized controlled trials are obtained to assess the effects of myoinositol vs. placebo or western medicine in women with PCOS. The study's registration number is CRD42017064563. The primary outcomes included total testosterone, estradiol (E2) and the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) of insulin resistance.

resultTen trials involving 573 patients were included. The meta-analysis results show that: compared with the control group, myoinositol may improve HOMA index (WMD -0.65; 95% CI -1.02, -0.28; P = 0. 0005) and increase the E2 level (WMD 16.16; 95% CI 2.01, 30.31; P = 0. 03); while there is no enough strong evidence that the myoinositol has an effect on the total testosterone level (WMD -16.11; 95% CI -46.08, 13.86; P = 0. 29).

conclusionBased on current evidence, myoinositol may be recommended for the treatment of PCOS with insulin resistance, as well as for improving symptoms caused by decreased estrogen in PCOS.

Indexed as

EstradiolFemaleHumansInositolMetforminPolycystic Ovary SyndromeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTestosteroneTreatment OutcomeEstradiolInositolMetforminTestosteroneMeta-analysisMyoinositolPolycystic ovary syndromeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29052180
OpenAlexW2765988286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.