Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29052110›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019

Developing a Novel Model to Improve Research and care for Cancer Survivors: a Feasibility Study.

Shoshana M Rosenberg, Jennifer A Ligibel, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt, Eric D Jacobsen, Judy E Garber, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Craig A Bunnell, Patricia Nutting, Kim Sprunck-Harrild, Sarah K Walsh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cancer survivorship programs at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shoshana M RosenbergDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. shoshana_rosenberg@dfci.harvard.edu.
Jennifer A LigibelDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Jeffrey A MeyerhardtDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Eric D JacobsenDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Judy E GarberDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Larissa NekhlyudovDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Craig A BunnellDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Patricia NuttingDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Kim Sprunck-HarrildDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Sarah K WalshDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Ann H PartridgeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

Funding

Improving surgical decision-making in young women with breast cancerK01HS023680 · AHRQ · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI ROSENBERG, SHOSHANA M · 2015 to 2019
$594k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS023680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a growing number of clinical trials and supportive care programs for cancer survivors, recruitment of patients for these opportunities during the survivorship phase of care is challenging. We piloted a novel process to systematically educate patients about available research studies and supportive care programs as part of a survivorship care visit. Between 3/2015 and 8/2015, patients seen in the Adult Survivorship Program who had not previously received a treatment summary and survivorship care plan (TS/SCP) were provided with one accompanied by a list of survivorship research studies and care programs tailored to their diagnosis. Survivorship providers discussed the opportunities and recorded whether the patient was interested in relevant studies and placed referrals to study staff. Following the visit, we tracked study enrollment and surveyed patients about their experience. Fifty of 56 (89%) pilot participants completed the survey. Almost all (98%) reported that the TS/SCP visit and document helped with knowledge of research opportunities and supportive care interventions. Following receipt of the TS/SCP, 44% were interested in at least one study and in further follow-up with research staff. Of the 30 survivors eligible for at least one study, 6 (20%) have enrolled in at least one study to date. This pilot program demonstrates that the systematic sharing of available clinical studies and supportive care programming as part of a survivorship care plan visit is feasible and well received by cancer survivors and may facilitate and enhance accrual to clinical trials in the survivorship phase of care.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthBiomedical ResearchCancer SurvivorsAdultAgedClinical Trials as TopicFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient Care PlanningPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorshipCancer survivorshipClinical trial enrollmentSurvivorship care plan

Identifiers

PMID29052110
PMCPMC5910291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.