Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29052018›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2018

End-Users' Product Preference Across Three Multipurpose Prevention Technology Delivery Forms: Baseline Results from Young Women in Kenya and South Africa.

Rachel Weinrib, Alexandra Minnis, Kawango Agot, Khatija Ahmed, Fred Owino, Kgahlisho Manenzhe, Helen Cheng, Ariane van der Straten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rachel WeinribWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California St Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA. rweinrib@rti.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7753-0996
Alexandra MinnisWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California St Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
Kawango AgotImpact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya.
Khatija AhmedSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
Fred OwinoImpact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya.
Kgahlisho ManenzheSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
Helen ChengWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California St Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
Ariane van der StratenWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California St Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
RTI International · USImpact Research and Development Organization · KESetshaba Research Centre · ZA

Funding

Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALLORY O JOHNSON · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1114942NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multipurpose prevention technology (MPT) that combines HIV and pregnancy prevention is a promising women's health intervention, particularly for young women. However, little is known about the drivers of acceptability and product choice for MPTs in this population. This paper explores approval ratings and stated choice across three different MPT delivery forms among potential end-users. The Trio Study was a mixed-methods study in women ages 18-30 that examined acceptability of three MPT delivery forms: oral tablets, injections, and vaginal ring. Approval ratings and stated choice among the products was collected at baseline. Factors influencing stated product choice were explored using multivariable multinomial logistic regression. The majority (62%) of women in Trio stated they would choose injections, 27% would choose tablets and 11% would choose the ring. Significant predictors of choice included past experience with similar contraceptive delivery forms, age, and citing frequency of use as important. Ring choice was higher for older (25-30) women than for younger (18-24) women (aRR = 3.1; p < 0.05). These results highlight the importance of familiarity in MPT product choice of potential for variations in MPT preference by age.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAdministration, IntravaginalAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCommunicable Disease ControlConsumer BehaviorContraceptionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaPregnancySouth AfricaAnti-HIV AgentsAcceptabilityEnd-user researchHIV preventionMultipurpose prevention technologiesProduct preference

Identifiers

PMID29052018
PMCPMC5758675
OpenAlexW2765318872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.