Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29051925›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2017

Opportunities and Design Considerations for Peer Support in a Hospital Setting.

Shefali Haldar, Sonali R Mishra, Maher Khelifi, Ari H Pollack, Wanda Pratt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Understanding Contexts and Challenges of Information Management for Epilepsy Care.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2023
    Article
  7. Use and impact of an online community for hospital patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Informatics opportunities to involve patients in hospital safety: a conceptual model.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the Design of an Inpatient Peer Support Tool: Views of Adult Patients.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
  12. Supporting Collaborative Health Tracking in the Hospital: Patients' Perspectives.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shefali HaldarBiomedical & Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sonali R MishraThe Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Maher KhelifiBiomedical & Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ari H PollackDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wanda PrattThe Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
Patients as safeguards: Understanding the information needs of hospitalized patieR01HS022894 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PRATT, WANDA · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022894NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although research has demonstrated improved outcomes for outpatients who receive peer support-such as through online health communities, support groups, and mentoring systems-hospitalized patients have few mechanisms to receive such valuable support. To explore the opportunities for a hospital-based peer support system, we administered a survey to 146 pediatric patients and caregivers, and conducted semi-structured interviews with twelve patients and three caregivers in a children's hospital. Our analysis revealed that hospitalized individuals need peer support for five key purposes: (1) to ask about medical details-such as procedures, treatments, and medications; (2) to learn about healthcare providers; (3) to report and prevent medical errors; (4) to exchange emotional support; and (5) to manage their time in the hospital. In this paper, we examine these themes and describe potential barriers to using a hospital-based peer support system. We then discuss the unique opportunities and challenges that the hospital environment presents when designing for peer support in this setting.

Indexed as

caregiverH.5.m. Information interfaces and presentationHealthHealth informaticshospitalJ.3 Life and Medical SciencesMedical Information Systemspatientpediatricpeer supportpeer-to-peer

Identifiers

PMID29051925
PMCPMC5644353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.