Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29051841›Full record

ArticleJournal of AIDS & clinical research2017

Perceived Cost Advantages and Disadvantages of Purchasing HIV Self-Testing Kits among Urban Tanzanian Men: An Inductive Content Analysis.

Larissa Jennings, Donaldson F Conserve, Jamison Merrill, Lusajo Kajula, Juliet Iwelunmor, Sebastian Linnemayr, Suzanne Maman

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of AIDS & clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03874663 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Acceptability and Performance of HIV Self-Testing in a Youth Population in Nigeria

TypeobservationalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2018 to 2020Enrolled652ConditionsHIV PreventionArmsDirectly assisted oral HIV self-testing (HIVST)
NCT04070287 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Tools to Expand HIV Self-Testing

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2019 to 2020Enrolled388ConditionsHIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted DiseasesArmsSMART Pack, Luv Box, Bili Vibes, BeterDoc, IUNGO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Larissa JenningsJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Baltimore, USA.
Donaldson F ConserveUniversity of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Columbia, USA.
Jamison MerrillJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Baltimore, USA.
Lusajo KajulaMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Juliet IwelunmorUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, Champaign, IL, USA.
Sebastian LinnemayrRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Suzanne MamanUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZRAND Corporation · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
A Multilevel Intervention to Reduce HIV Risk among Networks of Men in TanzaniaR01MH098690 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAMAN, SUZANNE · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
Integrating Microenterprise and Behavioral Economics for HIV Prevention in African-American Young AdultsK01MH107310 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI JENNINGS MAYO-WILSON, LARISSA · 2015 to 2019
$848k
Acceptability and Feasibility of Unsupervised HIV Self-Testing Among Networks of Men in TanzaniaK99MH110343 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CONSERVE, DONALDSON · 2016 to 2017
$166k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH107310NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH110343NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impoverished men have lower rates of facility-based HIV counseling and testing and higher unknown HIV-positive status than women. Economic theory suggests that individuals will obtain an HIV test if anticipated benefits are greater than anticipated costs. Yet, few studies have investigated the range of financial preferences of HIV self-testing (HIVST) among poor men who decline testing or do not test regularly. Twenty-three interviews were conducted to qualitatively assess perceived costs saved and costs incurred from use of HIVST kits in infrequently- or never-tested Tanzanian men. All men were shown an HIVST kit and video. They were then asked about the costs associated with provider-led HIV testing, financial benefits and concerns of HIVST and willingness to pay for HIVST. Data were transcribed, coded and analyzed using inductive content analyses. We then grouped codes into perceived cost advantages and disadvantages and tabulated the range of prices men were willing to pay for a self-test kit. Perceived cost advantages of HIVST were avoidance of spending money to test in facilities, omission of follow-up fees, affordability relative to private clinics, and increased time for earning income and other activities. Men also discussed the imbalance of the financial benefit of accessing free, public HIV testing with the resources spent for transport, purchasing meals away from home and long wait lines. Perceived cost disadvantages of HIVST were prohibitive kit costs, required prior savings to purchase kits, expenditures relating to death and preferences for free provider-performed testing. Men were also concerned about the psychological costs of inaccurate results. HIVST willingness to pay varied among men. Men's decisions to self-test for HIV takes into account expected financial gains and losses. Demand generation for HIVST among men should consider use of low fees or free HIVST, while emphasizing potential savings from reduced travel, clinical costs, or time way from work. Efforts are also needed to address anticipated emotional costs of HIVST, such as anxiety from kit errors, purchasing "death" or testing alone, which for some men was a substantial barrier.

Indexed as

CostsFinancial benefitsHIV self-testingMenQualitativeTanzania

Identifiers

PMID29051841
PMCPMC5645025
OpenAlexW2755820046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.