Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29051777›Full record

ReviewObstetric medicine2017

Melanoma in pregnancy.

Rebecca Still, Shaun Brennecke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetric medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. In situ and localized primary invasive pregnancy-associated melanoma: Maternal and perinatal outcomes.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Narrative Review of the Role of Estrogen (Receptors) in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Progress in melanoma treatment: Patient's perspectives.Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Melanoma in pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca StillMonash Health, Victoria, Australia.
Shaun BrenneckeDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is one of the most common cancers diagnosed in pregnancy and has a high metastatic potential. As the incidence of melanoma increases, careful clinical evaluation of suspicious skin lesions remains the mainstay of early diagnosis. There is controversy in the literature as to whether pregnancy-associated melanoma has worse survival than other melanomas. Any changing-pigmented lesion should be biopsied, regardless of pregnancy hyperpigmentation. Increased lymphangiogenesis in pregnancy is associated with increased metastasis - timely diagnosis is therefore imperative. While the effect of oestrogen and progesterone on melanoma is under investigation, it is generally accepted that oral contraceptive use in not contraindicated after a diagnosis of melanoma in pregnancy. Subsequent pregnancy should be delayed for two to three years after a diagnosis of melanoma with a high risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

malignancymelanomaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29051777
PMCPMC5637994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.