ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017
Genomic GC-Content Affects the Accuracy of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Based Microbial Profiling due to PCR Bias.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Single-cell detection and quantification of the microbiota by MicFLY.Cell host & microbe · 2026Article
- Metagenomic Insights Into Red Sea Biodiversity Across the Web of Life.Environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Enrichment of Hydrogen-Oxidizing Bacteria Using a Hybrid Biological-Inorganic System Under a High COMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- A Scalable and Cost-Effective In-Line Barcoding Strategy for Standardized 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing: Performance Evaluation and Bias Assessment.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Toward reproducible pig gut microbiome profiling through standardized methodologies.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Observation Bias in Metabarcoding.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Single-cell quantification of the microbiota by flow cytometry: MicFLY.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Gut Microbial Signatures of Broiler Lines Divergently Selected for Inosine Monophosphate and Intramuscular Fat Content.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Article
- Loperamide increases mouse gut transit time in a dose-dependent manner with treatment duration-dependent effects on distinct gut microbial taxa.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Synthetic spike-in metabarcoding for plant pathogen diagnostics results in precise quantification of copy number within the genusISME communications · 2025Article
- Internal transcribed spacers enable species-level Metataxonomic analysis of ciliated protozoa.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Using short-read 16S rRNA sequencing of multiple variable regions to generate high-quality results to a species level.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Unraveling Whole-Genome Sequence and Functional Characterization ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Improving the Accuracy of Bulk Fitness Assays by Correcting Barcode Processing Biases.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- An integrative protocol for one-step PCR amplicon library construction and accurate demultiplexing of pooled sequencing data.Marine life science & technology · 2023Article
- Evaluating cpn60 for high-resolution profiling of the mammalian skin microbiome and detection of phylosymbiosis.ISME communications · 2023Article
- Comparison of Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Illumina MiSeq sequencing with mock communities and agricultural soil.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Best Practices in Designing, Sequencing, and Identifying Random DNA Barcodes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Profiling of microbial community composition is frequently performed by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing on benchtop platforms following PCR amplification of specific hypervariable regions within this gene. Accuracy and reproducibility of this strategy are two key parameters to consider, which may be influenced during all processes from sample collection and storage, through DNA extraction and PCR based library preparation to the final sequencing. In order to evaluate both the reproducibility and accuracy of 16S rRNA gene based microbial profiling using the Ion Torrent PGM platform, we prepared libraries and performed sequencing of a well-defined and validated 20-member bacterial DNA mock community on five separate occasions and compared results with the expected even distribution. In general the applied method had a median coefficient of variance of 11.8% (range 5.5-73.7%) for all 20 included strains in the mock community across five separate sequencing runs, with underrepresented strains generally showing the largest degree of variation. In terms of accuracy, mock community species belonging to Proteobacteria were underestimated, whereas those belonging to Firmicutes were mostly overestimated. This could be explained partly by premature read truncation, but to larger degree their genomic GC-content, which correlated negatively with the observed relative abundances, suggesting a PCR bias against GC-rich species during library preparation. Increasing the initial denaturation time during the PCR amplification from 30 to 120 s resulted in an increased average relative abundance of the three mock community members with the highest genomic GC%, but did not significantly change the overall evenness of the community distribution. Therefore, efforts should be made to optimize the PCR conditions prior to sequencing in order to maximize accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.