Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29051535›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

The biomechanical origin of extreme wing allometry in hummingbirds.

Dimitri A Skandalis, Paolo S Segre, Joseph W Bahlman, Derrick J E Groom, Kenneth C Welch, Christopher C Witt, Jimmy A McGuire, Robert Dudley, David Lentink, Douglas L Altshuler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Turkey vultures tune their airspeed to changing air density.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Extreme elevational migration spurred cryptic speciation in giant hummingbirds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. The spatiotemporal richness of hummingbird wing deformations.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Zebra finch (Biology open · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dimitri A SkandalisDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4.
Paolo S SegreDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4.
Joseph W BahlmanDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4.
Derrick J E GroomDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto, Scarborough, ON, Canada, M1C 1A4.
Kenneth C WelchDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto, Scarborough, ON, Canada, M1C 1A4.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-6510
Christopher C WittDepartment of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.
Jimmy A McGuireMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Robert DudleyDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3707-5682
David LentinkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Douglas L AltshulerDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4. doug@zoology.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1364-3617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flying animals of different masses vary widely in body proportions, but the functional implications of this variation are often unclear. We address this ambiguity by developing an integrative allometric approach, which we apply here to hummingbirds to examine how the physical environment, wing morphology and stroke kinematics have contributed to the evolution of their highly specialised flight. Surprisingly, hummingbirds maintain constant wing velocity despite an order of magnitude variation in body weight; increased weight is supported solely through disproportionate increases in wing area. Conversely, wing velocity increases with body weight within species, compensating for lower relative wing area in larger individuals. By comparing inter- and intraspecific allometries, we find that the extreme wing area allometry of hummingbirds is likely an adaptation to maintain constant burst flight capacity and induced power requirements with increasing weight. Selection for relatively large wings simultaneously maximises aerial performance and minimises flight costs, which are essential elements of humming bird life history.

Indexed as

Flight, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBirdsPhylogeographyWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID29051535
PMCPMC5715027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.