Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29051521›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Evaluating feasibility of an automated 3-dimensional scanner using Raman spectroscopy for intraoperative breast margin assessment.

G Thomas, T-Q Nguyen, I J Pence, B Caldwell, M E O'Connor, J Giltnane, M E Sanders, A Grau, I Meszoely, M Hooks and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Multiplexed imaging in oncology.Nature biomedical engineering · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G ThomasVanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
T-Q NguyenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
I J PenceVanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
B CaldwellVanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
M E O'ConnorVanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
J GiltnaneGenentech, San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8333-9995
M E SandersDivision of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
A GrauDivision of Surgical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
I MeszoelyDivision of Surgical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
M HooksDivision of Surgical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
M C KelleyDivision of Surgical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5188-1931
A Mahadevan-JansenVanderbilt Biophotonics Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA. anita.mahadevan-jansen@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast conserving surgery is the preferred treatment for women diagnosed with early stage invasive breast cancer. To ensure successful breast conserving surgeries, efficient tumour margin resection is required for minimizing tumour recurrence. Currently surgeons rely on touch preparation cytology or frozen section analysis to assess tumour margin status intraoperatively. These techniques have suboptimal accuracy and are time-consuming. Tumour margin status is eventually confirmed using postoperative histopathology that takes several days. Thus, there is a need for a real-time, accurate, automated guidance tool that can be used during tumour resection intraoperatively to assure complete tumour removal in a single procedure. In this paper, we evaluate feasibility of a 3-dimensional scanner that relies on Raman Spectroscopy to assess the entire margins of a resected specimen within clinically feasible time. We initially tested this device on a phantom sample that simulated positive tumour margins. This device first scans the margins of the sample and then depicts the margin status in relation to an automatically reconstructed image of the phantom sample. The device was further investigated on breast tissues excised from prophylactic mastectomy specimens. Our findings demonstrate immense potential of this device for automated breast tumour margin assessment to minimise repeat invasive surgeries.

Indexed as

Spectrum Analysis, RamanArea Under CurveAutomationBreastBreast NeoplasmsEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMastectomyROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID29051521
PMCPMC5648832
OpenAlexW2761515549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.