ReviewToxics2015
Nanotoxicology and Metalloestrogens: Possible Involvement in Breast Cancer.
Review in Toxics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aluminium as a Metalloestrogen: Toxicological Pathways, Endocrine Disruption and Systemic Health Implications.Maedica · 2026Review
- Associations between dietary exposure to profiles of metalloestrogens and estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer risk in the French E3N cohort.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025Article
- Time-specific impact of trace metals on breast density of adolescent girls in Santiago, Chile.International journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Long-term environmental metal exposure is associated with hypomethylation of CpG sites in NFKB1 and other genes related to oncogenesis.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
- The function of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in response to cadmium exposure.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Metals and Metal-Nanoparticles in Human Pathologies: From Exposure to Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Metals and Breast Cancer Risk: A Prospective Study Using Toenail Biomarkers.American journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Probiotic antigenotoxic activity as a DNA bioprotective tool: a minireview with focus on endocrine disruptors.FEMS microbiology letters · 2020Review
- A Precautionary Approach to Guide the Use of Transition Metal-Based Nanotechnology to Prevent Orthopedic Infections.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Overview of Cadmium Thyroid Disrupting Effects and Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Estrogenic Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Influencing NRF1 Regulated Gene Networks in the Development of Complex Human Brain Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
- Aluminum as a Possible Cause Toward Dyslipidemia.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the use of nanotechnology has expanded, an increased number of metallic oxides have been manufactured, yet toxicology testing has lagged significantly. Metals used in nano-products include titanium, silicon, aluminum, silver, zinc, cadmium, cobalt, antimony, gold,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.