Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29051194›Full record

ArticleGenetics2017

Haploid Selection Favors Suppressed Recombination Between Sex Chromosomes Despite Causing Biased Sex Ratios.

Michael F Scott, Sarah P Otto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rapid turnover of sex-determining architecture in invasive mussels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Sex chromosomes, sex ratios and sex gaps in longevity in plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Are plant and animal sex chromosomes really all that different?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exaggerated heterochiasmy in a fish with sex-linked male coloration polymorphisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael F ScottUniversity College London (UCL) Genetics Institute (UGI), Department of Genetics, Environment and Evolution, UCL, WC1E 6BT, UK m.f.scott@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-9946
Sarah P OttoDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3042-0818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, research on the evolution of sex chromosomes has focused on sexually antagonistic selection among diploids, which has been shown to be a potent driver of the strata and reduced recombination that characterize many sex chromosomes. However, significant selection can also occur on haploid genotypes during less conspicuous life cycle stages,

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsDiploidyFemaleGenotypeHaploidyMaleMeiosisRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticSex ChromosomesSex RatioSpermatozoameiotic drivepollen competitionrecombination evolutionsex chromosomessex ratiosperm competition

Identifiers

PMID29051194
PMCPMC5714470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.