Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29050441›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2017

The physiological response of broiler chickens to the dietary supplementation of the bacteriocin nisin and ionophore coccidiostats.

B Kieronczyk, M Sassek, E Pruszynska-Oszmalek, P Kolodziejski, M Rawski, S Swiatkiewicz, D Józefiak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Combination ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B KieronczykPoznan University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, ul. Wolynska 33, 60-637 Poznan, Poland.
M SassekPoznan University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, ul. Wolynska 33, 60-637 Poznan, Poland.
E Pruszynska-OszmalekPoznan University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, ul. Wolynska 33, 60-637 Poznan, Poland.
P KolodziejskiPoznan University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, ul. Wolynska 33, 60-637 Poznan, Poland.
M RawskiPoznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, ul. Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.
S SwiatkiewiczDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, National Research Institute of Animal Production, ul. Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.
D JózefiakPoznan University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Management, ul. Wolynska 33, 60-637 Poznan, Poland.
University of Life Sciences in Poznań · PLNational Research Institute of Animal Production · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dietary supplementation with nisin alone or in combination with salinomycin or monensin on broiler chickens in terms of growth performance, selected blood parameters, digestive enzyme activity, apparent nutrient digestibility, and tibiotarsus mineralization, as well as selected gastrointestinal tract (GIT) organ weights, intestinal length, and central immune organ weights. Two independent experiments, each including 400 one-day-old female Ross 308 chicks differing in ionophore coccidiostats, i.e., salinomycin and monensin supplementation, were conducted. The following treatments were applied: experiment 1: NA-no additives, SAL-salinomycin (60 mg/kg diet), NIS-nisin (2,700 IU/kg diet), SAL+NIS-salinomycin (60 mg/kg diet) and nisin (2,700 IU/kg diet); experiment 2: NA-no additives, MON-monensin (100 mg/kg diet), NIS-nisin (2,700 IU/kg diet) and MON+NIS-monensin (100 mg/kg diet) and nisin (2,700 IU/kg diet). The addition of nisin with or without ionophores to the birds' diet improved broiler growth performance in terms of BWG and FCR (days 1 to 14) and BWG and FI (15 to 35 d; 1 to 35 d). Salinomycin showed effects similar to those of nisin influence on growth performance (1 to 35 d), while monensin supplementation resulted in lower BWG. Moreover, no additive effect between nisin and ionophores was observed. Nisin and salinomycin had no influence on the serum concentration of selected hormones and other blood biochemical parameters except glucose, which was reduced by nisin. A decrease in lipase activity was observed during nisin and salinomycin supplementation, while the apparent ileal digestibility of fat was not affected. However, the digestibility of crude protein increased with nisin administration. Additionally, the effects of nisin on decreasing the weight and length of GIT segments were observed. Supplementation with nisin and monensin was not associated with a negative impact on tibiotarsus mineralization and the immune organ index. This study suggests that nisin may be used in broiler nutrition as a growth promotor, with no negative influence on the bird's metabolism or immune status.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsChickensCoccidiostatsDietDietary SupplementsDigestionFemaleMonensinNisinPolyether PolyketidesPyransRandom AllocationCoccidiostatsMonensinNisinPolyether PolyketidesPyranssalinomycinbacteriocinblood parameterbroiler chickendigestibilityperformance

Identifiers

PMID29050441
PMCPMC5850792
OpenAlexW2758204649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.