Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29050350›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Surgical resection for hepatic metastasis from gastric cancer: a multi- institution study.

Ailin Song, Xiaofeng Zhang, Feng Yu, Debang Li, Wenyu Shao, Yanming Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating the utility of computed tomography of the chest for gastric cancer stagingCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ailin SongDepartment of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xiaofeng ZhangDepartment of Special Treatment, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Feng YuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 101th Hospital of Chinese PLA, Wuxi, China.
Debang LiDepartment of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Wenyu ShaoDepartment of Liver Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yanming ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe beneficial effect of surgical resection for hepatic metastasis from gastric cancer (HMGC) remains elusive. This study was conducted to analyze surgical outcomes of HMGC and determine the prognostic factors associated with survival.

resultsThe in-hospital mortality rate was zero, and the overall morbidity rate was 56%. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate after surgery was 87.5%, 47.6%, and 21.7%, respectively, with a median survival time of 34.0 months. Multiple liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR] =1.998; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.248-3.198; MATERIALS AND

methodsData on surgical resection of 96 patients with HMGC at six institutions in China were analysed retrospectively. Prognostic factors were assessed by multiple stepwise regression analysis using the Cox model.

conclusionsSurgical resection for HMGC is feasible and beneficial to long-term survival in selected patients.

Indexed as

gastric cancerhepatectomyliver metastasesprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29050350
PMCPMC5642625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.