Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29049915›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2017

Adult primary cervical extra-osseous Ewing's sarcoma: A case report and short literature review.

Haytham Eloqayli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haytham EloqayliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Irbid, 22110, Jordan. Electronic address: heloqayli@yahoo.com.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrimary spinal epidural extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma (EES) is extremely rare, with a peak incidence in the second decade of life. EES in old people is challenging to treat due to the lack of specific guidelines. In this paper, I present a unique case of adult primary cervical epidural EES with a 13-month follow-up. A short literature review of the therapeutic approaches and prognosis is also presented. PRESENTATION OF CASE: I present a case of a 49-year old male patient who presented with right upper limb pain, numbness, hand grip weakness, and hyperreflexia of 3 months duration. Enhanced cervical magnetic resonance imaging showed a homogenously enhancing epidural and paravertebral soft tissue mass extending from the C6 to the T2 that appeared hypointense on T1 and hyperintense on T2. The patient underwent biopsy that confirmed EES via histopathology. Treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy resulted in tumor resolution and symptom relief. DISCUSSION: EES is a type of PNET. Surgical removal is generally the treatment of choice, followed by adjunctive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In old patients with large tumors, a more conservative approach with biopsy, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is recommended.

conclusionsAdult primary cervical epidural EES is a neurosurgical challenge due to the extension to the surrounding vital structures making the tumor not amenable for total resection as in the present case. In the absence of specific therapeutic guidelines, our case highlights the need to individualize the treatment modality according to age, tumor extension, and feasibility of total tumor resection.

Indexed as

Case reportCervicalEwing’s sarcomaSpine

Identifiers

PMID29049915
PMCPMC5647515
OpenAlexW2761755692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.