Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29049654›Full record

ArticleJAMA2017

Association of Blood Transfusion From Female Donors With and Without a History of Pregnancy With Mortality Among Male and Female Transfusion Recipients.

Camila Caram-Deelder, Aukje L Kreuger, Dorothea Evers, Karen M K de Vooght, Daan van de Kerkhof, Otto Visser, Nathalie C V Péquériaux, Francisca Hudig, Jaap Jan Zwaginga, Johanna G van der Bom and 1 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06176105 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Mortality After Transfusion of Ever-pregnant Donor Red Blood Cells

TypeobservationalSponsorSanquin-LUMC J.J van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion ResearchRan2019 to 2020Enrolled101,000ConditionsAnemia
NCT06840756 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Donor-recipient Sex-matched Versus Sex-mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMichelle ZellerRan2025 to 2029Enrolled11,082ConditionsRed Blood Cell Transfusions, Sex Differences, Health Services, Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit PatientsArmsSex-mismatched red blood cell transfusions, Sex-matched red blood cell transfusions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Nomogram for the Therapeutic Efficacy of Apheresis Platelet Transfusion in Hematologic Patients.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Effect of Sex-Mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Endothelial Cell Activation in Critically Ill Patients.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Camila Caram-DeelderCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Aukje L KreugerCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dorothea EversCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Karen M K de VooghtDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Daan van de KerkhofDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Otto VisserDepartment of Haematology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nathalie C V PéquériauxDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Francisca HudigLabWest, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Jaap Jan ZwagingaCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Johanna G van der BomCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rutger A MiddelburgCenter for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sanquin · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLHaga Hospital · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Transfusion of red blood cells from female donors has been associated with increased mortality in male recipients. Objective: To quantify the association between red blood cell transfusion from female donors with and without a history of pregnancy and mortality of red blood cell recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of first-time transfusion recipients at 6 major Dutch hospitals enrolled from May 30, 2005, to September 1, 2015; the final follow-up date was September 1, 2015. The primary analysis was the no-donor-mixture cohort (ie, either all red blood cell transfusions exclusively from male donors, or all exclusively from female donors without a history of pregnancy, or all exclusively from female donors with a history of pregnancy). The association between mortality and exposure to transfusions from ever-pregnant or never-pregnant female donors was analyzed using life tables and time-varying Cox proportional hazards models. Exposures: Red blood cell transfusions from ever-pregnant or never-pregnant female donors, compared with red blood cell transfusions from male donors. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause mortality during follow-up. Results: The cohort for the primary analyses consisted of 31 118 patients (median age, 65 [interquartile range, 42-77] years; 52% female) who received 59 320 red blood cell transfusions exclusively from 1 of 3 types of donors (88% male; 6% ever-pregnant female; and 6% never-pregnant female). The number of deaths in this cohort was 3969 (13% mortality). For male recipients of red blood cell transfusions, all-cause mortality rates after a red blood cell transfusion from an ever-pregnant female donor vs male donor were 101 vs 80 deaths per 1000 person-years (time-dependent "per transfusion" hazard ratio [HR] for death, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.01-1.26]). For receipt of transfusion from a never-pregnant female donor vs male donor, mortality rates were 78 vs 80 deaths per 1000 person-years (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81-1.06]). Among female recipients of red blood cell transfusions, mortality rates for an ever-pregnant female donor vs male donor were 74 vs 62 per 1000 person-years (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.13]); for a never-pregnant female donor vs male donor, mortality rates were 74 vs 62 per 1000 person-years (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.88-1.15]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who received red blood cell transfusions, receipt of a transfusion from an ever-pregnant female donor, compared with a male donor, was associated with increased all-cause mortality among male recipients but not among female recipients. Transfusions from never-pregnant female donors were not associated with increased mortality among male or female recipients. Further research is needed to replicate these findings, determine their clinical significance, and identify the underlying mechanism.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolErythrocytesErythrocyte TransfusionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29049654
PMCPMC5817970
OpenAlexW2767074201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.