ReviewJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2017
Speech Perception in Complex Acoustic Environments: Developmental Effects.
Review in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Vocal Emotions Produced by Children With Cochlear Implants Are Perceived by Their Hearing Peers.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Trial
- Talker identification under adverse auditory conditions-The impacts of noise, channel, language, and familiarity.PloS one · 2026Article
- Be Quiet! Effects of Competing Speakers and Individual Characteristics on Listening Comprehension for Primary School Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Are musical activities associated with enhanced speech perception in noise in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Current research in neurobiology · 2023Review
- Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Speech Perception in Classroom Acoustics by Children With Hearing Loss and Wearing Hearing Aids.American journal of audiology · 2020Article
- Masked English Speech Recognition Performance in Younger and Older Spanish-English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
- Pediatric Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Different Types of Background Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
- Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.Hearing research · 2019Article
- Noise, Age, and Gender Effects on Speech Intelligibility and Sentence Comprehension for 11- to 13-Year-Old Children in Real Classrooms.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Masked Speech Recognition in School-Age Children.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- Infants use onset asynchrony cues in auditory scene analysis.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Introduction to the Research Symposium Forum.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2017Article
- Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.Ear and hearingArticle
- Language-Independent Hearing Screening Based on Masked Recognition of Ecological Sounds.Trends in hearingArticle
- Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The ability to hear and understand speech in complex acoustic environments follows a prolonged time course of development. The purpose of this article is to provide a general overview of the literature describing age effects in susceptibility to auditory masking in the context of speech recognition, including a summary of findings related to the maturation of processes thought to facilitate segregation of target from competing speech. Method: Data from published and ongoing studies are discussed, with a focus on synthesizing results from studies that address age-related changes in the ability to perceive speech in the presence of a small number of competing talkers. Conclusions: This review provides a summary of the current state of knowledge that is valuable for researchers and clinicians. It highlights the importance of considering listener factors, such as age and hearing status, as well as stimulus factors, such as masker type, when interpreting masked speech recognition data. Presentation Video: http://cred.pubs.asha.org/article.aspx?articleid=2601620.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.