Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29049522›Full record

ArticleJAMA2017

Ten Steps the Federal Government Should Take Now to Reverse the Opioid Addiction Epidemic.

Andrew Kolodny, Thomas R Frieden

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Can accurate demographic information about people who use prescription medications nonmedically be derived from Twitter?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. When Public Health Goes Wrong: Toward a New Concept of Public Health Error.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
  8. Hospital Care for Opioid use in Illinois, 2016-2019.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew KolodnyHeller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Thomas R FriedenResolve, Vital Strategies, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionAnalgesics, OpioidDrug LabelingDrug OverdoseEpidemicsFederal GovernmentHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesMarketingOpioid-Related DisordersUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.