Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29049518›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2017

Long-term Outcomes After Proton Beam Irradiation in Patients With Large Choroidal Melanomas.

Thanos D Papakostas, Anne Marie Lane, Margaux Morrison, Evangelos S Gragoudas, Ivana K Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. External Beam Radiotherapy in the Management of Uveal Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thanos D PapakostasRetina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Anne Marie LaneRetina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Margaux MorrisonRetina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Evangelos S GragoudasRetina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Ivana K KimRetina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although radiotherapy has been used more frequently in past decades for the management of large melanomas, long-term efficacy of proton beam irradiation (PBI) of large choroidal melanomas has not been reported. Objective: To evaluate long-term outcomes in patients who underwent PBI for the treatment of large choroidal melanomas. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were obtained at a single Boston, Massachusetts, academic tertiary referral practice for this retrospective cohort study. In total, 336 patients with large tumors treated over a 13-year period from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1997, and followed up until the end points were reached or until December 31, 2008, were included. Data analyses were initially completed in February 2017 and finalized in July 2017. Large tumors were those with a height 10 mm or greater or a longest linear diameter greater than 16 mm or a height greater than 8 mm when the optic nerve was involved. Intervention: Proton beam irradiation (total 70 Gy) delivered in 5 equal fractions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of rates of visual acuity retention, eye retention, tumor recurrence, and melanoma-related mortality were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were completed to evaluate risk factors for tumor recurrence and melanoma-related mortality. Results: In this cohort of 336 patients with large tumors, 150 were women and 329 were white; mean (SD) age was 60.0 (14.0) years. Of 178 patients without optic nerve involvement (tumor >1 disc diameter from optic nerve), the mean (SD) largest basal diameter was 18.1 (1.9) mm and mean height was 8.2 (2.7) mm. Optic nerve involvement and tumors greater than 8 mm were observed in 109 patients (32.4% of the cohort). Baseline visual acuity of 20/200 or better was observed in 244 patients (72.6%), and worse than 20/800 in 52 (15.5%). Ten-year rates of visual acuity retention were 8.7% (95% CI, 4.1%-15.6%) for at least 20/200 and 22.4% (95% CI, 15.4%-30.4%) for at least counting fingers. Ten years after PBI therapy, the eye was retained (70.4%; 95% CI, 61.5%-77.6%) and tumor controlled (87.5%; 95% CI, 76.8%-93.5%) in most patients. The 10-year all-cause mortality rate was 60.7% (95% CI, 55.5%-65.9%). Approximately half of the patients died of metastatic uveal melanoma (10-year rate, 48.5%; 95% CI, 43.0%-54.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates that eye conservation is possible in most cases, with ambulatory vision retained in a small proportion of patients 10 years after PBI. Tumor recurrence rates were low and mortality rates were comparable to those observed after enucleation.

Indexed as

ForecastingVisual AcuityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBostonChoroid NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedProton TherapyRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID29049518
PMCPMC5710395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.