ArticlePloS one2017
A new machine-learning method to prognosticate paraquat poisoned patients by combining coagulation, liver, and kidney indices.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequential organ failure assessment in predicting mortality after paraquat poisoning: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Puncture frequency, coagulopathy, and liver injury as independent risk factors for bleeding in acute diquat poisoning after enhanced blood purification therapy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute paraquat poisoning.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Analysis of COVID-19 severity from the perspective of coagulation index using evolutionary machine learning with enhanced brain storm optimization.Journal of King Saud University. Computer and information sciences · 2022Article
- Risk factors and optimal predictive scoring system of mortality for children with acute paraquat poisoning.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Horizontal and vertical search artificial bee colony for image segmentation of COVID-19 X-ray images.Computers in biology and medicine · 2022Article
- Gray wolf optimization-extreme learning machine approach for diabetic retinopathy detection.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Evolutionary warning system for COVID-19 severity: Colony predation algorithm enhanced extreme learning machine.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Diagnosing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Efficient Harris Hawks-Inspired Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor Prediction Methods.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021Article
- Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Prognosis Prediction of Patients with Acute Paraquat Poisoning: A Retrospective Cohort Study.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Serum anion gap at admission as a predictor of the survival of patients with paraquat poisoning: A retrospective analysis.Medicine · 2020Observational
- Performance of machine-learning algorithms to pattern recognition and classification of hearing impairment in Brazilian farmers exposed to pesticide and/or cigarette smoke.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
- Point-of-care testing in the early diagnosis of acute pesticide intoxication: The example of paraquat.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognosis of paraquat (PQ) poisoning is highly correlated to plasma PQ concentration, which has been identified as the most important index in PQ poisoning. This study investigated the predictive value of coagulation, liver, and kidney indices in prognosticating PQ-poisoning patients, when aligned with plasma PQ concentrations. Coagulation, liver, and kidney indices were first analyzed by variance analysis, receiver operating characteristic curves, and Fisher discriminant analysis. Then, a new, intelligent, machine learning-based system was established to effectively provide prognostic analysis of PQ-poisoning patients based on a combination of the aforementioned indices. In the proposed system, an enhanced extreme learning machine wrapped with a grey wolf-optimization strategy was developed to predict the risk status from a pool of 103 patients (56 males and 47 females); of these, 52 subjects were deceased and 51 alive. The proposed method was rigorously evaluated against this real-life dataset, in terms of accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficients, sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, the feature selection was investigated to identify correlating factors for risk status. The results demonstrated that there were significant differences in the coagulation, liver, and kidney indices between deceased and surviving subjects (p<0.05). Aspartate aminotransferase, prothrombin time, prothrombin activity, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, urea nitrogen, and creatinine were the most highly correlated indices in PQ poisoning and showed statistical significance (p<0.05) in predicting PQ-poisoning prognoses. According to the feature selection, the most important correlated indices were found to be associated with aspartate aminotransferase, the aspartate aminotransferase to alanine ratio, creatinine, prothrombin time, and prothrombin activity. The method proposed here showed excellent results that were better than that produced based on blood-PQ concentration alone. These promising results indicated that the combination of these indices can provide a new avenue for prognosticating the outcome of PQ poisoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.