ArticlePloS one2017
Pig movements in France: Designing network models fitting the transmission route of pathogens.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Active Participatory Surveillance for Early Detection of Notifiable Pathogens: A Case Study of the U.S. Swine Industry.Viruses · 2026Article
- Data quality assessment of pig movements in the Norwegian Livestock Register reveals challenges for outbreak preparedness.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Evolution of the Swiss pork production systems and logistics: the impact on infectious disease resilience.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mechanistic modelling for African swine fever transmission in the Republic of Korea.Journal of veterinary science · 2023Article
- The Importance of the Slaughterhouse in Surveilling Animal and Public Health: A Systematic Review.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Direct and indirect pathways for the spread of African swine fever and other porcine infectious diseases: An application of the mental models approach.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Emerging infectious diseases may spread across pig trade networks in Thailand once introduced: a network analysis approach.Tropical animal health and production · 2022Article
- Multiple species animal movements: network properties, disease dynamics and the impact of targeted control actions.Veterinary research · 2022Article
- Complex network analysis to understand trading partnership in French swine production.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Illustration of Different Disease Transmission Routes in a Pig Trade Network by Monopartite and Bipartite Representation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Article
- Virus persistence in pig herds led to successive reassortment events between swine and human influenza A viruses, resulting in the emergence of a novel triple-reassortant swine influenza virus.Veterinary research · 2019Article
- Article
- When resolution does matter: Modelling indirect contacts in dairy farms at different levels of detail.PloS one · 2019Article
- Threat to the French Swine Industry of African Swine Fever: Surveillance, Spread, and Control Perspectives.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019Article
- Combining network analysis with epidemiological data to inform risk-based surveillance: Application to hepatitis E virus (HEV) in pigs.Preventive veterinary medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathogen spread between farms results from interaction between the epidemiological characteristics of infectious agents, such as transmission route, and the contact structure between holdings. The objective of our study was to design network models of pig movements matching with epidemiological features of pathogens. Our first model represents the transmission of infectious diseases between farms only through the introduction of animals to holdings (Animal Introduction Model AIM), whereas the second one also accounts for pathogen spread through intermediate transit of trucks through farms even without any animal unloading (i.e. indirect transmission-Transit Model TM). To take the pyramidal organisation of pig production into consideration, these networks were studied at three different scales: the whole network and two subnetworks containing only breeding or production farms. The two models were applied to pig movement data recorded in France from June 2012 to December 2014. For each type of model, we calculated network descriptive statistics, looked for weakly/strongly connected components (WCCs/SCCs) and communities, and analysed temporal patterns. Whatever the model, the network exhibited scale-free and small-world topologies. Differences in centrality values between the two models showed that nucleus, multiplication and post-weaning farms played a key role in the spread of diseases transmitted exclusively by the introduction of infected animals, whereas farrowing and farrow-to-finish herds appeared more vulnerable to the introduction of infectious diseases through indirect contacts. The second network was less fragmented than the first one, a giant SCC being detected. The topology of network communities also varied with modelling assumptions: in the first approach, a huge geographically dispersed community was found, whereas the second model highlighted several small geographically clustered communities. These results underline the relevance of developing network models corresponding to pathogen features (e.g. their transmission route), and the need to target specific types of holdings/areas for surveillance depending on the epidemiological context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.