Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29049174›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2017

Value of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions: A meta-analysis.

Yan Xue, Shuxin Yao, Xiaodong Li, Huarong Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Versus Gastrointestinal Leiomyoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan XueDepartment of Ultrasonography, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi City, Shandong Department of Ultrasonography, Heze Municipal Hospital, Heze City, Shandong Department of Radiology, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi City, Shandong, China.
Shuxin Yao
Xiaodong Li
Huarong Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) for malignant breast lesions through a meta-analysis.Related articles were searched from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library. Overall sensitivity and specificity were analyzed with DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Area under curve with corresponding 95% confidence interval (were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SWE. Sensitivity and publication bias were assessed as well.A total of 25 articles including 4128 patients and 4546 breast lesions were included in the pooled analysis. In the subgroup analysis, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of SWE in Asian population were 0.84 (0.79-0.88) and 0.87 (0.84-0.90), respectively, whereas they were 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 0.89 (0.84-0.92) in Caucasian population. The diagnostic accuracy of SWE was a little higher for Caucasians than for Asians (0.95 vs. 0.92). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of virtual touch tissue quantification were 0.85 (0.77-0.91) and 0.93 (0.88-0.96), respectively. It showed a little higher value in specificity and summary ROC curve than SWE (0.93 vs. 0.87; 0.95 vs. 0.93). In addition, maximum stiffness exhibited higher detection sensitivity than that of mean stiffness (0.91 vs. 0.85).SWE serves as an accurate diagnostic technology for discriminating between malignant and benign breast lesions.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveAsian PeopleBreastBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityWhite People

Identifiers

PMID29049174
PMCPMC5662340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.