ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2018
Effects of Dextran-70 and Albumin on Coagulation in Experimental Hemorrhage in the Guinea Pig.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nephrotoxicity of Herbal Medicine and Its Prevention.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2018Article
- Reference ranges for rotational thromboelastometry in male Sprague Dawley rats.Thrombosis journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDextran-70 is a more potent plasma volume expander than albumin but use has been hampered because of its antithrombotic properties. However, also albumin has antithrombotic properties and little is known about relative effects of these two colloids on coagulation in vivo when controlling for differences in efficacy as plasma volume expanders.
aimCompare effects of dextran-70 and albumin on coagulation at a dose resulting in equal plasma volume expansion.
methodsGuinea pigs were subjected to a 25 mL/kg hemorrhage during 20 min and randomized to resuscitation with either 6% dextran-70 at a dose of 15 mL/kg or 5% albumin at a dose of 25 mL/kg (n = 14 in each group) during 30 min starting 1 h of shock. Blood samples were collected at the completion of resuscitation and at 4 h. Plasma volume was measured using I-albumin and the effect on coagulation was evaluated using whole blood thrombelastography (TEG), measurement of plasma fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor (vWF) concentrations and vWF glycoprotein 1b (GP1b) A activity.
resultsPlasma volumes after resuscitation were similar in the groups at both time points. Dextran-70 resulted in a transient prolongation of TEG clot amplification time (K) at the completion of resuscitation compared with albumin. TEG clot initiation (R) and strength (MA) did not differ between the treatments at any of the time points. Albumin reduced vWF concentrations to a larger extent than dextran at both time points, whereas no difference in vWF GP1bA activity or in plasma fibrinogen and could be detected.
conclusionIn equipotent doses with regard to plasma volume expansion, dextran-70 transiently prolongs clot amplification time more than albumin whereas dextran-70 reduces plasma vWF concentrations less than albumin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.