Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29048987›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Health literacy and vaccination: A systematic review.

Chiara Lorini, Francesca Santomauro, Martina Donzellini, Leonardo Capecchi, Angela Bechini, Sara Boccalini, Paolo Bonanni, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Vaccine Literacy and Vaccination: A Systematic Review.International journal of public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chiara Lorinia Department of Health Science , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.
Francesca Santomauroa Department of Health Science , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.
Martina Donzellinib School of Specialization on Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence , Florence , Italy.
Leonardo Capecchib School of Specialization on Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence , Florence , Italy.
Angela Bechinia Department of Health Science , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6013-8779
Sara Boccalinia Department of Health Science , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9695-7549
Paolo Bonannia Department of Health Science , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2875-3744
Guglielmo Bonaccorsia Department of Health Science , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review describes the current relationship between health literacy (HL) and vaccination (including attitude to vaccines, intention to vaccinate, and vaccine uptake). The aim is to comprehend the role of HL as a determinant of vaccine hesitancy. For this purpose, the following databases were explored from 1 January 2007 to 15 January 2017: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Health Evidence, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Nine studies were included in the final synthesis. The role of HL in predicting vaccine hesitancy or acceptance seems to be influenced by a few key factors. These include country, age, and type of vaccine. However, the relationship between HL and vaccination remains unclear. New research studies are needed-particularly longitudinal ones that use multiple measurement tools. This would facilitate a better understanding of the role of HL in predicting vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment RefusalVaccinationHumanscompliancehealth literacypreventionvaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID29048987
PMCPMC5806657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.