Trial reportAmerican journal of public health2017
Shade Sails and Passive Recreation in Public Parks of Melbourne and Denver: A Randomized Intervention.
Trial report in American journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02971709 (Norms and Built Environment), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Norms and Built Environment: Use of Shade in U.S. and Australian City Parks
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Participation and Physical Activities in Parks: A Systematic Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Are Environmental Interventions Targeting Skin Cancer Prevention among Children and Adolescents Effective? A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy of a facial-aging web app on sun protection behaviors among primary school students in Iran: a randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- Solar UV Measured under Built-Shade in Public Parks: Findings from a Randomized Trial in Denver and Melbourne.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Descriptive analysis of municipal policies addressing shade in eight southwest and northeast states in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of community-based heat adaptation interventions: a systematic review.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- An evaluation of the amount, type and use of shade at public playgrounds in Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2022Article
- Article
- The experience of outdoor physical activity for skin cancer survivors: understanding the importance of the built and natural environments.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020Article
- Examining Health-Related Effects of Refurbishment to Parks in a Lower Socioeconomic Area: The ShadePlus Natural Experiment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Shade as an Environmental Design Tool for Skin Cancer Prevention.American journal of public health · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo test whether shade sails will increase the use of passive recreation areas (PRAs).
methodsWe conducted a stratified randomized pretest-posttest controlled design study in Melbourne, Australia, and Denver, Colorado, in 2010 to 2014. We randomized a sample of 144 public parks with 2 PRAs in full sun in a 1:3 ratio to treatment or control. Shade sails were built at 1 PRA per treatment park. The outcome was any use of the study PRA (n = 576 pretest and n = 576 posttest observations; 100% follow-up).
resultsCompared with control PRAs (adjusted probability of use: pretest = 0.14, posttest = 0.17), use of treatment PRAs (pretest = 0.10, posttest = 0.32) was higher at posttest (odds ratio [OR] = 3.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71, 8.94). Shade increased use of PRAs in Denver (control: pretest = 0.18, posttest = 0.19; treatment: pretest = 0.16, posttest = 0.47) more than Melbourne (control: pretest = 0.11, posttest = 0.14; shaded: pretest = 0.06, posttest = 0.19; OR = 2.98; 95% CI = 1.09, 8.14).
conclusionsPublic investment in shade is warranted for skin cancer prevention and may be especially useful in the United States.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02971709.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.