Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29048537›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2017

Group Living and Male Dispersal Predict the Core Gut Microbiome in Wild Baboons.

Laura E Grieneisen, Josh Livermore, Susan Alberts, Jenny Tung, Elizabeth A Archie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura E GrieneisenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Josh LivermoreDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Susan AlbertsDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Jenny TungDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.

Funding

THE RANGE OF MALE-FEMALE MORTALITY DIFFERENCESP01AG031719 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ZENG, YI · 2009 to 2020
$10.2M
Mechanisms and Consequences of Social Connectedness in a Wild Primate PopulationR01AG034513 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERTS, SUSAN C. · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
Epigenetic Consequences of Social Status across the Life Span in a Primate ModelR21AG049936 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERTS, SUSAN C., TUNG, JENNY · 2014 to 2015
$319k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG031719NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034513NIA NIH HHS R21 AG049936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian gut microbiome plays a profound role in the physiology, metabolism, and overall health of its host. However, biologists have only a nascent understanding of the forces that drive inter-individual heterogeneity in gut microbial composition, especially the role of host social environment. Here we used 178 samples from 78 wild yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) living in two social groups to test how host social context, including group living, social interactions within groups, and transfer between social groups (e.g., dispersal) predict inter-individual variation in gut microbial alpha and beta diversity. We also tested whether social effects differed for prevalent "core" gut microbial taxa, which are thought to provide primary functions to hosts, versus rare "non-core" microbes, which may represent relatively transient environmental acquisitions. Confirming prior studies, we found that each social group harbored a distinct gut microbial community. These differences included both non-core and core gut microbial taxa, suggesting that these effects are not solely driven by recent gut microbial exposures. Within social groups, close grooming partners had more similar core microbiomes, but not non-core microbiomes, than individuals who rarely groomed each other, even controlling for kinship and diet similarity between grooming partners. Finally, in support of the idea that the gut microbiome can be altered by current social context, we found that the longer an immigrant male had lived in a given social group, the more closely his gut microbiome resembled the gut microbiomes of the group's long-term residents. Together, these results reveal the importance of a host's social context in shaping the gut microbiome and shed new light onto the microbiome-related consequences of male dispersal.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSocial BehaviorAnimalsKenyaMalePapio cynocephalus

Identifiers

PMID29048537
PMCPMC5886331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.