Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29047428›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2017

Symptom- and Laboratory-Based Ebola Risk Scores to Differentiate Likely Ebola Infections.

Shefali Oza, Alieu A Sesay, Neal J Russell, Kevin Wing, Sabah Boufkhed, Lahai Vandi, Sahr C Sebba, Rachael Cummings, Francesco Checchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shefali Oza
Alieu A Sesay
Neal J Russell
Kevin Wing
Sabah Boufkhed
Lahai Vandi
Sahr C Sebba
Rachael Cummings
Francesco Checchi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly identifying likely Ebola patients is difficult because of a broad case definition, overlap of symptoms with common illnesses, and lack of rapid diagnostics. However, rapid identification is critical for care and containment of contagion. We analyzed retrospective data from 252 Ebola-positive and 172 Ebola-negative patients at a Sierra Leone Ebola treatment center to develop easy-to-use risk scores, based on symptoms and laboratory tests (if available), to stratify triaged patients by their likelihood of having Ebola infection. Headache, diarrhea, difficulty breathing, nausea/vomiting, loss of appetite, and conjunctivitis comprised the symptom-based score. The laboratory-based score also included creatinine, creatine kinase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin. This risk score correctly identified 92% of Ebola-positive patients as high risk for infection; both scores correctly classified >70% of Ebola-negative patients as low or medium risk. Clinicians can use these risk scores to gauge the likelihood of triaged patients having Ebola while awaiting laboratory confirmation.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingAdolescentAdultClinical Laboratory TechniquesCohort StudiesFemaleHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansMaleModels, BiologicalPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTime-to-TreatmentTriageYoung Adultdisease outbreaksEbolaEbola virusEbola virus diseaseEVDhemorrhagic feverriskSierra Leoneviruses

Identifiers

PMID29047428
PMCPMC5652431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.