Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29047417›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2017

Levosimendan for patients with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function and/or low cardiac output syndrome undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Filippo Sanfilippo, Joshua B Knight, Sabino Scolletta, Cristina Santonocito, Federico Pastore, Ferdinando L Lorini, Luigi Tritapepe, Andrea Morelli, Antonio Arcadipane

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05685537 (Impact of Levosimendan Preconditioning on Critical Care and In-hospital Lengths of Stay After Cardiac Surgery With Bypass Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05685537 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Levosimendan Preconditioning on Critical Care and In-hospital Lengths of Stay After Cardiac Surgery With Bypass Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2022 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsLevosimendan, Cardiac Surgery, Cardiopulmonary BypassArmsLevosimendan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. [Pro: Levosimendan in Cardiac Surgery].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Levosimendan Efficacy and Safety: 20 Years of SIMDAX in Clinical Use.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Filippo SanfilippoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy. fgsanfilippo@ismett.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0776
Joshua B KnightDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Sabino ScollettaUnit of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Cristina SantonocitoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Federico PastoreDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Ferdinando L LoriniDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Luigi TritapepeDepartment of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological, Anaesthetic and Geriatric Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Andrea MorelliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Policlinico Umberto 1, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonio ArcadipaneDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown beneficial effects of levosimendan in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), however, showed no advantages of levosimendan.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (MEDLINE and Embase from inception until March 30, 2017), investigating whether levosimendan offers advantages compared with placebo in high-risk cardiac surgery patients, as defined by preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and/or low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). The primary outcomes were mortality at longest follow-up and need for postoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT). Secondary postoperative outcomes investigated included myocardial injury, supraventricular arrhythmias, development of LCOS, acute kidney injury (AKI), duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, and incidence of hypotension during drug infusion.

resultsSix RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, five of which investigated only patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and one of which included predominantly patients with LCOS. Mortality was similar overall (OR 0.64 [0.37, 1.11], p = 0.11) but lower in the subgroup with LVEF < 35% (OR 0.51 [0.32, 0.82], p = 0.005). Need for RRT was reduced by levosimendan both overall (OR 0.63 [0.42, 0.94], p = 0.02) and in patients with LVEF < 35% (OR 0.55 [0.31, 0.97], p = 0.04). Among secondary outcomes, we found lower postoperative LCOS in patients with LVEF < 35% receiving levosimendan (OR 0.49 [0.27, 0.89], p = 0.02), lower overall AKI (OR 0.62 [0.42, 0.92], p = 0.02), and a trend toward lower mechanical support, both overall (p = 0.07) and in patients with LVEF < 35% (p = 0.05).

conclusionsLevosimendan reduces mortality in patients with preoperative severely reduced LVEF but does not affect overall mortality. Levosimendan reduces the need for RRT after high-risk cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

Cardiac Output, LowCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiotonic AgentsHumansHydrazonesPyridazinesSimendanStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftCardiotonic AgentsHydrazonesPyridazinesSimendanEjection fractionIntensive careMortalityRenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID29047417
PMCPMC5648477
OpenAlexW2765163187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.