ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2017
Cellular and molecular characterization of gametogenic progression in ex vivo cultured prepuberal mouse testes.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A simplified two-dimensional culture system supports meiotic progression during mouse spermatogenesis in vitro.PloS one · 2026Article
- Improvements in in vitro spermatogenesis: oxygen concentration, antioxidants, tissue-form design, and space control.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2024Article
- The Organotypic Culture of Mouse Seminiferous Tubules as a Reliable Methodology for the Study of Meiosis In Vitro.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Culture-space control is effective in promoting haploid cell formation and spermiogenesis in vitro in neonatal mice.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Generation of rat offspring using spermatids produced through in vitro spermatogenesis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- LCRMP-1 is required for spermatogenesis and stabilises spermatid F-actin organization via the PI3K-Akt pathway.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Rat in vitro spermatogenesis promoted by chemical supplementations and oxygen-tension control.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Chemotherapy induced damage to spermatogonial stem cells in prepubertal mouse in vitro impairs long-term spermatogenesis.Toxicology reports · 2021Article
- Protamine and other proteins in sperm and seminal plasma as molecular markers of bull fertility.Veterinary world · 2020Review
- In vitro spermatogenesis in two-dimensionally spread mouse testis tissues.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2019Article
- In vitro spermatogenesis: A century-long research journey, still half way around.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2018Review
- In vitro mouse spermatogenesis with an organ culture method in chemically defined medium.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, an effective testis culture method using a gas-liquid interphase, capable of differentiate male germ cells from neonatal spermatogonia to spermatozoa has been developed. Nevertheless, this methodology needs deep analyses that allow future experimental approaches in basic, pathologic and/or reprotoxicologic studies. Because of this, we characterized at cellular and molecular levels the entire in vitro spermatogenic progression, in order to understand and evaluate the characteristics that define the spermatogenic process in ex vivo cultured testes compared to the in vivo development.
methodsTesticular explants of CD1 mice aged 6 and 10 days post-partum were respectively cultured during 55 and 89 days. Cytological and molecular approaches were performed, analyzing germ cell proportion at different time culture points, meiotic markers immunodetecting synaptonemal complex protein SYCP3 by immunocytochemistry and the relative expression of different marker genes along the differentiation process by Reverse Transcription - quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction. In addition, microRNA and piwi-interactingRNA profiles were also evaluated by Next Generation Sequencing and bioinformatic approaches.
resultsThe method promoted and maintained the spermatogenic process during 89 days. At a cytological level we detected spermatogenic development delays of cultured explants compared to the natural in vivo process. The expression of different spermatogenic stages gene markers correlated with the proportion of different cell types detected in the cytological preparations.
conclusionsIn vitro progression analysis of the different spermatogenic cell types, from both 6.5 dpp and 10.5 dpp testes explants, has revealed a relative delay in relation to in vivo process. The expression of the genes studied as biomarkers correlates with the cytologically and functional detected progression and differential expression identified in vivo. After a first analysis of deep sequencing data it has been observed that as long as cultures progress, the proportion of microRNAs declined respect to piwi-interactingRNAs levels that increased, showing a similar propensity than which happens in in vivo spermatogenesis. Our study allows to improve and potentially to control the ex vivo spermatogenesis development, opening new perspectives in the reproductive biology fields including male fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.