ArticleBMC ophthalmology2017
Intrasession repeatability of ocular anatomical measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety, Efficacy, and Visual Performance of an Orthokeratology Lens with Increased Compression Factor.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Advanced Optical Wavefront Technologies to Improve Patient Quality of Vision and Meet Clinical Requests.Polymers · 2022Review
- Relationship between Axial Length and Corneo-Scleral Topography: A Preliminary Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Repeatability of non-invasive break-up time measures with a new automated dry eye platform in healthy eyes.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Intrasession repeatability of pupil size measurements under different light levels provided by a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Repeatability and agreement of two anterior segment OCT in myopic patients before implantable collamer lenses implantation.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- The prevalence of refractive errors in college students in Israel.Journal of optometryArticle
- Validation of refraction and anterior segment parameters by a new multi-diagnostic platform (VX120).Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the intrasession repeatability of anterior chamber depth (ACD), central (CCT) and peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), white-to-white diameter (WTW), and irido-corneal angle (IA) measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.
methodsA total of 107 eyes of 107 patients ranging in age from 23 to 65 years were examined with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies). Three consecutive measurements were obtained with this device to assess the intrasession repeatability of ACD, CCT, PCT at different nasal and temporal locations, WTW, and nasal and temporal IA. Data analysis included the calculation of within-subject standard deviation (S
resultsThe S
conclusionsThe VX120 system is able to provide repeatable measurements of anatomical parameters in healthy eyes. Inter-observer repeatability should be evaluated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.