Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29047336›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

A qualitative exploration of work-related head injury: vulnerability at the intersection of workers' decision making and organizational values.

P Kontos, A Grigorovich, B Nowrouzi, B Sharma, J Lewko, T Mollayeva, A Colantonio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

P KontosToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. pia.kontos@uhn.ca.
A GrigorovichToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
B NowrouziToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
B SharmaToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J LewkoCentre for Research in Human Development, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
T MollayevaToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
A ColantonioToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Acquired Brain Injury Ireland · IEUniversity Health Network · CALaurentian University · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CA

Funding

CIHR #CGW-126580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWork-related head injury is a critical public health issue due to its rising prevalence; the association with profound disruption of workers' lives; and significant economic burdens in terms of medical costs and lost wages. Efforts to understand and prevent these types of injuries have largely been dominated by epidemiological research and safety science, which has focused on identifying risk at the level of the individual worker, population group, or organizational sector. Limited research has focused on the perspectives of the workers, a key stakeholder group for informing understanding of vulnerability to work-related head injury. This study explored workers' perspectives to better understand their decision-making and how and why their injuries occurred.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews with thirty-two adult workers who had sustained a work-related head injury. Workers were recruited from an urban clinic in central Ontario, Canada. Labour Process Theory informed the thematic analysis.

resultsThree hazardous work conditions were identified: insufficient training; inadequate staffing; and inattention to the physical environment. In addition, professional and organizational norms were implicated in vulnerability to head injury including putting the client before the worker and the pressure to work unsafely. The findings also highlight a complex interrelationship between workers' decision-making and professional and organizational norms that produces vulnerability to head injury, a vulnerability which oftentimes is reproduced by workers' decisions to work despite hazardous conditions.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that, beyond the need to redress the inattention to hazards in the physical environment, there is a need to address norms that influence worker decision-making to improve the safety of workers. Using Labour Process Theory highlights an important social dynamic within workplace sectors that could inform future development and implementation of multi-level and integrated public health strategies to reduce work-related head injury.

Indexed as

AdultCraniocerebral TraumaDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational InjuriesOntarioOrganizational CultureQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID29047336
PMCPMC5648438
OpenAlexW2766096126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.