ArticleObesity surgery2018
Comparison of Imaging Modalities for Detecting Complications in Bariatric Surgery.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02813122 (The Use of X-ray in Bariatric Surgeries), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of X-ray in Bariatric Surgeries
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of routine fluoroscopic swallowing study (FSS) imaging 24 h after surgery and computed tomography (CT) on demand based on clinical data, in diagnosing complications after bariatric surgery. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis retrospective study includes 9386 patients that underwent bariatric surgery. A total of 3241 (34.53%) patients underwent FSS imaging following the surgical procedure, and 106 (1.13%) patients underwent CT.
resultsSleeve gastrectomy was performed in 8093 patients (75.81%), gastric bypass was performed in 1281 patients (12%), duodenal switch or biliopancreatic diversion was performed in 12 patients (0.11%), and gastric banding was performed in 1289 patients (12.07%), which were excluded from the study as no imaging modality was used in any of these patients. The sensitivity for FSS was 71.43% and the specificity was 99.85%. An analysis of disease prevalence revealed a value of 0.43% with a positive predictive value of 66.67%. The sensitivity for CT was 71.42% and the specificity was 98%. A disease prevalence analysis revealed a value of 6.60% with a positive predictive value of 83.33%. A comparison of the two modalities showed that FSS has higher specificity values (p < 0.02) and a higher accuracy (p < 0.0001) than CT.
conclusionCT and FSS have a similar sensitivity for diagnosing complications after bariatric surgery. However, the specificity and accuracy of FSS are superior to that of CT. This study was approved by the instructional ethics committee (Helsinki board) and was registered on the National Institutes of Health ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) web site with identifier NCT02813122.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.