Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29047002›Full record

ReviewLasers in medical science2017

Treatment of keloid scars using light-, laser- and energy-based devices: a contemporary review of the literature.

E Forbat, F R Ali, F Al-Niaimi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lasers in medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Future Directions About Keloid Scars Based on Pathogenesis and Therapies.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
  6. Keloids: a review of therapeutic management.International journal of dermatology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Keloids: A Review of Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E ForbatChelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Rd, London, SW10 9NH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-9172
F R AliDermatological Surgery & Laser Unit, St John's Institute of Dermatology,, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
F Al-NiaimiDermatological Surgery & Laser Unit, St John's Institute of Dermatology,, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. firas55@hotmail.com.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keloid scars are common and have a predilection for young, ethnic skin often with a family history. Keloids can be painful and pruritic and cause significant emotional distress when particularly visible or prominent. In this article, we review the evidence underlying the use of laser- and energy-based devices for treatment of keloid scars, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with other therapies such as corticosteroids, surgery and silicone gel in the treatment of keloid scars.

Indexed as

LasersLightCicatrix, HypertrophicDrug Delivery SystemsEthnicityHumansKeloidSkinKeloidLaserLightScars

Identifiers

PMID29047002
OpenAlexW2766898976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.