ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical investigation2017
Physicochemical and surface properties of acrylic intraocular lenses and their clinical significance.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study to compare the safety and efficacy of different hydrophobic aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Scanning electron microscopy of artificial corneal endothelial keratoplasty implant.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Article
- Strategic Design of Biocompatible, Glistening-Free, and Foldable Artificial Intraocular Lenses Based on Hydro-Amphiphilic Ternary Copolymers.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Based on Distance from Haptic to Principal Object Plane.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025Article
- Intraocular Lens Unfurling Time Exponentially Decays with Increased Solution Temperature.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Physicochemical Analysis of Sediments Formed on the Surface of Hydrophilic Intraocular Lens after Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Study on buckling of intraocular lens haptic in 2 types of intraocular lens material and its effect on vision.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyObservational
- Cataract: Surgery first - is there still room for basic research?Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze and compare several commercially available acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) with particular regard to their clinical significance, we examined the physicochemical and surface properties of four currently available acrylic IOLs using static water contact angle, atomic force microscopy (AFM), Raman spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements. The hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, ZA9003, and MA60BM, had contact angles ranging from 77.9° ± 0.65° to 84.4° ± 0.09°. The contact angles in the hydrophilic acrylic (970C) and heparin-surface-modified (HSM) hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (BioVue) were 61.8° ± 0.45° and 69.7° ± 0.76°, respectively. The roughness of the IOL optic surface differed depending on the type of IOL (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.