ArticleJournal of biological engineering2017
Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Optimal Selection of Biodegradable Polymer Composites for Load-Bearing Bone Tissue Engineering: A Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Framework with Sensitivity-Based Robustness Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Multi-Objective Optimization of Mechanical and Geometric Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Porous Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of bone formation within β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds in a sheep scapular bioreactor model using micro-computed tomography analysis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- L1 vertebral body replacement using 3D-printed polylactic acid bioimplants:Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
- Electrospinning PLLA/PCL Blend Fibre-Based Materials and Their Biomedical Application: A Mini Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Biological Characterization of 3D-Printed, Sintered Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Obtained by Fused Filament Fabrication: An In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Osteogenic Differentiation in Chitosan-Based Scaffolds via P28 and VEGF Delivery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering: Printing Techniques, Biomaterials, Challenges, and the Emerging Role of 4D Bioprinting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Histological Processing of Scaffolds: Challenges and Solutions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- In Vitro Biological Properties Assessment of 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite-Polylactic Acid Scaffolds Intended for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Imino-Pyrrole Zn(II) Complexes for the Rapid and Selective Chemical Recycling of Commodity Polymers.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Investigation of the Effects of 3D Printing Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Bone Scaffolds: Experimental Study Integrated with Artificial Neural Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The impact of microstructure and extracellular matrix suspension on the proliferation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for osteochondral defect repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Research Progress of Bone Grafting: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Resonant acoustic mixing-assisted fabrication and evaluation of FDM-printed PLA/β-TCP scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Applications of Hydroxyapatite-Based Polymeric Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering: An Update.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024Review
- Biocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Materials, Fabrication Techniques and Future Directions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Composites of Polylactic Acid with Diatomaceous Earth for 3D-Printing Biocompatible Scaffolds: A Systematic Study of Their Mechanical, Thermal, and Biocompatibility Properties.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe primary objective of Tissue engineering is a regeneration or replacement of tissues or organs damaged by disease, injury, or congenital anomalies. At present, Tissue engineering repairs damaged tissues and organs with artificial supporting structures called scaffolds. These are used for attachment and subsequent growth of appropriate cells. During the cell growth gradual biodegradation of the scaffold occurs and the final product is a new tissue with the desired shape and properties. In recent years, research workplaces are focused on developing scaffold by bio-fabrication techniques to achieve fast, precise and cheap automatic manufacturing of these structures. Most promising techniques seem to be Rapid prototyping due to its high level of precision and controlling. However, this technique is still to solve various issues before it is easily used for scaffold fabrication. In this article we tested printing of clinically applicable scaffolds with use of commercially available devices and materials. Research presented in this article is in general focused on "scaffolding" on a field of bone tissue replacement.
resultsCommercially available 3D printer and Polylactic acid were used to create originally designed and possibly suitable scaffold structures for bone tissue engineering. We tested printing of scaffolds with different geometrical structures. Based on the osteosarcoma cells proliferation experiment and mechanical testing of designed scaffold samples, it will be stated that it is likely not necessary to keep the recommended porosity of the scaffold for bone tissue replacement at about 90%, and it will also be clarified why this fact eliminates mechanical properties issue. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the size of an individual pore could be double the size of the recommended range between 0.2-0.35 mm without affecting the cell proliferation.
conclusionRapid prototyping technique based on Fused deposition modelling was used for the fabrication of designed scaffold structures. All the experiments were performed in order to show how to possibly solve certain limitations and issues that are currently reported by research workplaces on the field of scaffold bio-fabrication. These results should provide new valuable knowledge for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.