ArticlePlant methods2017
Improved method for genomic DNA extraction for
Article in Plant methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quorum Sensing and Mobility Inhibition of Pathogenic Bacteria byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- New Species ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Phylogenetic and Morphological Analyses Reveal Twelve New Species of the GenusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three New Species of Mytilinidioid Fungi (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from Mexico.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Eleven New Species of the GenusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Whole-genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023Article
- Unravelling phylogenetic relationships of the tribe Cereeae using target enrichment sequencing.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Five New Species ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Physical Pretreatments Applied in Three Commercial Kits for the Extraction of High-Quality DNA from Activated Sewage Sludge.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- New Ascomycetes from the Mexican Tropical Montane Cloud Forest.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Novelties in Macrofungi of the Tropical Montane Cloud Forest in Mexico.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- MycoKeys · 2023Article
- Review
- Diversity Assessment and DNA-Based Fingerprinting of Sicilian Hazelnut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- SILEX: a fast and inexpensive high-quality DNA extraction method suitable for multiple sequencing platforms and recalcitrant plant species.Plant methods · 2020Article
- A simple and effective method to obtain high DNA quality and quantity from Cerrado plant species.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Development of an innovative and sustainable one-step method for rapid plant DNA isolation for targeted PCR using magnetic ionic liquids.Plant methods · 2019Article
- A novel sequestrate species from Mexico:MycoKeys · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic DNA extracted from species of Cactaceae is often contaminated with significant amounts of mucilage and pectin. Pectin is one of the main components of cellular walls, whereas mucilage is a complex polysaccharide with a ramified structure. Thus, pectin- and mucilage-free extraction of DNA is a key step for further downstream PCR-based analyses.
resultsWe tested our DNA extraction method on cladode tissue (juvenile, adult, and herbaria exemplars) of 17 species of
conclusionWe developed a method for the extraction of gDNA free of inhibitory compounds common in species of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.