ReviewFrontiers in psychology2017
Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vicarious Touch: A Potential Substitute for Social Touch During Touch Deprivation.European journal of social psychology · 2026Article
- Stability of value perception: minimal influence of framing on moral attributions to a humanoid robot.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- On dueling multi-act arithmetic: exploring the dynamics of goal-driven competition on engagement and cognition.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- The influence of human agency beliefs on ascribing gaze-signalled communicative intent.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive robot eyes enhance attentional guidance in cooperative human-robot interaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Can humanoid robots be used as a cognitive offloading tool?Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Review
- Neural dynamics of mental state attribution to social robot faces.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- From robots to chatbots: unveiling the dynamics of human-AI interaction.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Intentional or Designed? The Impact of Stance Attribution on Cognitive Processing of Generative AI Service Failures.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- The impact of differential pricing subject on consumer behavior.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Propensity to trust shapes perceptions of comforting touch between trustworthy human and robot partners.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Social perception of robots is shaped by beliefs about their minds.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Editorial: Neurocognitive features of human-robot and human-machine interaction.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Perceptual discrimination in the face perception of robots is attenuated compared to humans.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Empathic embarrassment towards non-human agents in virtual environments.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- How AI's Self-Prolongation Influences People's Perceptions of Its Autonomous Mind: The Case of U.S. Residents.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Self-discrepancies in mind perception for actual, ideal, and ought selves and partners.PloS one · 2023Article
- Nursing and human-computer interaction in healthcare robots for older people: An integrative review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2022Review
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robots are increasingly envisaged as our future cohabitants. However, while considerable progress has been made in recent years in terms of their technological realization, the ability of robots to interact with humans in an intuitive and social way is still quite limited. An important challenge for social robotics is to determine how to design robots that can perceive the user's needs, feelings, and intentions, and adapt to users over a broad range of cognitive abilities. It is conceivable that if robots were able to adequately demonstrate these skills, humans would eventually accept them as social companions. We argue that the best way to achieve this is using a systematic experimental approach based on behavioral and physiological neuroscience methods such as motion/eye-tracking, electroencephalography, or functional near-infrared spectroscopy embedded in interactive human-robot paradigms. This approach requires understanding how humans interact with each other, how they perform tasks together and how they develop feelings of social connection over time, and using these insights to formulate design principles that make social robots attuned to the workings of the human brain. In this review, we put forward the argument that the likelihood of artificial agents being perceived as social companions can be increased by designing them in a way that they are perceived as intentional agents that activate areas in the human brain involved in social-cognitive processing. We first review literature related to social-cognitive processes and mechanisms involved in human-human interactions, and highlight the importance of perceiving others as intentional agents to activate these social brain areas. We then discuss how attribution of intentionality can positively affect human-robot interaction by (a) fostering feelings of social connection, empathy and prosociality, and by (b) enhancing performance on joint human-robot tasks. Lastly, we describe circumstances under which attribution of intentionality to robot agents might be disadvantageous, and discuss challenges associated with designing social robots that are inspired by neuroscientific principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.