Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29046308›Full record

ReviewClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2017

Progress toward Development of a Vaccine against Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.

Mark R Schleiss, Sallie R Permar, Stanley A Plotkin

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A vaccine against cytomegalovirus: how close are we?The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark R SchleissCenter for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Translational Research, University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Pediatrics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA schleiss@umn.edu.
Sallie R PermarDuke University Medical School, Human Vaccine Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Stanley A PlotkinUniversity of Pennsylvania, Vaxconsult, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USSimulConsult · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Optimized Vaccines Against Congenital Infection and Maternal Reinfection with CMVR01HD079918 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SCHLEISS, MARK R. · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vaccine against congenital human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major public health priority. Congenital CMV causes substantial long-term morbidity, particularly sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), in newborns, and the public health impact of this infection on maternal and child health is underrecognized. Although progress toward development of a vaccine has been limited by an incomplete understanding of the correlates of protective immunity for the fetus, knowledge about some of the key components of the maternal immune response necessary for preventing transplacental transmission is accumulating. Moreover, although there have been concerns raised about observations indicating that maternal seropositivity does not fully prevent recurrent maternal CMV infections during pregnancy, it is becoming increasing clear that preconception immunity does confer some measure of protection against both CMV transmission and CMV disease (if transmission occurs) in the newborn infant. Although the immunity to CMV conferred by both infection and vaccination is imperfect, there are encouraging data emerging from clinical trials demonstrating the immunogenicity and potential efficacy of candidate CMV vaccines. In the face of the knowledge that between 20,000 and 30,000 infants are born with congenital CMV in the United States every year, there is an urgent and compelling need to accelerate the pace of vaccine trials. In this minireview, we summarize the status of CMV vaccines in clinical trials and provide a perspective on what would be required for a CMV immunization program to become incorporated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCytomegalovirus InfectionsCytomegalovirus VaccinesFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesCytomegalovirus Vaccinescongenital infectionscytomegalovirusplacental immunologyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID29046308
PMCPMC5717185
OpenAlexW2766601956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.