Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29045829›Full record

ArticleCell reports2017

Escaping Host Factor PI4KB Inhibition: Enterovirus Genomic RNA Replication in the Absence of Replication Organelles.

Charlotte E Melia, Hilde M van der Schaar, Heyrhyoung Lyoo, Ronald W A L Limpens, Qian Feng, Maryam Wahedi, Gijs J Overheul, Ronald P van Rij, Eric J Snijder, Abraham J Koster and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Enterovirus infections in children.Pediatric investigation · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. An efficientJournal of virology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PI4KIIIβ-Mediated Phosphoinositides Metabolism Regulates Function of the VTA Dopaminergic Neurons and Depression-Like Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charlotte E MeliaDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands.
Hilde M van der SchaarDepartment of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CL, the Netherlands.
Heyrhyoung LyooDepartment of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CL, the Netherlands.
Ronald W A L LimpensDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands.
Qian FengDepartment of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CL, the Netherlands.
Maryam WahediDepartment of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CL, the Netherlands.
Gijs J OverheulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen 6525 GA, the Netherlands.
Ronald P van RijDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen 6525 GA, the Netherlands.
Eric J SnijderDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Abraham J KosterDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands.
Montserrat BárcenaDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.barcena@lumc.nl.
Frank J M van KuppeveldDepartment of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CL, the Netherlands. Electronic address: f.j.m.vankuppeveld@uu.nl.

Funding

European Research Council 615680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteroviruses reorganize cellular endomembranes into replication organelles (ROs) for genome replication. Although enterovirus replication depends on phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type IIIβ (PI4KB), its role, and that of its product, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P), is only partially understood. Exploiting a mutant coxsackievirus resistant to PI4KB inhibition, we show that PI4KB activity has distinct functions both in proteolytic processing of the viral polyprotein and in RO biogenesis. The escape mutation rectifies a proteolytic processing defect imposed by PI4KB inhibition, pointing to a possible escape mechanism. Remarkably, under PI4KB inhibition, the mutant virus could replicate its genome in the absence of ROs, using instead the Golgi apparatus. This impaired RO biogenesis provided an opportunity to investigate the proposed role of ROs in shielding enteroviral RNA from cellular sensors. Neither accelerated sensing of viral RNA nor enhanced innate immune responses was observed. Together, our findings challenge the notion that ROs are indispensable for enterovirus genome replication and immune evasion.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsEnterovirusGenome, ViralGolgi ApparatusHeLa CellsHumansMinor Histocompatibility AntigensOrganellesPhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)ProteolysisRNA, ViralViral Proteins3A protein, coxsackievirus BAntiviral AgentsMinor Histocompatibility Antigensphosphatidylinositol phosphate 4-kinasePhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)RNA, ViralViral Proteinsenterovirusinnate immunityphosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type IIIβPI4Ppolyprotein processingreplication organelles

Identifiers

PMID29045829
PMCPMC5656745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.