Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29045655›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017

Determinants of the Efficacy of Natural Selection on Coding and Noncoding Variability in Two Passerine Species.

Pádraic Corcoran, Toni I Gossmann, Henry J Barton, Great Tit HapMap Consortium, Jon Slate, Kai Zeng

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How Much DoesGenetics · 2020
    Article
  11. Runaway GC Evolution in Gerbil Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pádraic CorcoranDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Toni I GossmannDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Henry J BartonDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Great Tit HapMap Consortium
Jon SlateDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Kai ZengDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K000209/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population genetic theory predicts that selection should be more effective when the effective population size (Ne) is larger, and that the efficacy of selection should correlate positively with recombination rate. Here, we analyzed the genomes of ten great tits and ten zebra finches. Nucleotide diversity at 4-fold degenerate sites indicates that zebra finches have a 2.83-fold larger Ne. We obtained clear evidence that purifying selection is more effective in zebra finches. The proportion of substitutions at 0-fold degenerate sites fixed by positive selection (α) is high in both species (great tit 48%; zebra finch 64%) and is significantly higher in zebra finches. When α was estimated on GC-conservative changes (i.e., between A and T and between G and C), the estimates reduced in both species (great tit 22%; zebra finch 53%). A theoretical model presented herein suggests that failing to control for the effects of GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is potentially a contributor to the overestimation of α, and that this effect cannot be alleviated by first fitting a demographic model to neutral variants. We present the first estimates in birds for α in the untranslated regions, and found evidence for substantial adaptive changes. Finally, although purifying selection is stronger in high-recombination regions, we obtained mixed evidence for α increasing with recombination rate, especially after accounting for gBGC. These results highlight that it is important to consider the potential confounding effects of gBGC when quantifying selection and that our understanding of what determines the efficacy of selection is incomplete.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsBase CompositionFinchesGene ConversionGenetics, PopulationGenomeGenomicsMaleModels, GeneticOpen Reading FramesPasseriformesPopulation DensitySelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAUntranslated Regionsadaptive evolutiondistribution of fitness effectseffective population sizeGC-biased gene conversionpasserine birdspurifying selection

Identifiers

PMID29045655
PMCPMC5714183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.