ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017
Determinants of the Efficacy of Natural Selection on Coding and Noncoding Variability in Two Passerine Species.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opinion: Why Sex-Based Genomic Differentiation Should Not Be Overlooked in Population Genetics.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Evolution of GC-biased gene conversion by natural selection.Genetics · 2025Article
- Compensatory Evolution Following Deleterious Episodes of GC-biased Gene Conversion in Rodents.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Increased Positive Selection in Highly Recombining Genes Does not Necessarily Reflect an Evolutionary Advantage of Recombination.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- A chromosome-level reference genome and pangenome for barn swallow population genomics.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Unusual mammalian usage of TGA stop codons reveals that sequence conservation need not imply purifying selection.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Globally Relaxed Selection and Local Adaptation in Boechera stricta.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Bottleneck-associated changes in the genomic landscape of genetic diversity in wild lynx populations.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Genetic Drift Dominates Genome-Wide Regulatory Evolution Following an Ancient Whole-Genome Duplication in Atlantic Salmon.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- How Much DoesGenetics · 2020Article
- Runaway GC Evolution in Gerbil Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Biased Gene Conversion Constrains Adaptation inGenetics · 2020Article
- Noncoding regions underpin avian bill shape diversification at macroevolutionary scales.Genome research · 2020Article
- Is adaptation limited by mutation? A timescale-dependent effect of genetic diversity on the adaptive substitution rate in animals.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- A Study of Faster-Z Evolution in the Great Tit (Parus major).Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Quantifying GC-Biased Gene Conversion in Great Ape Genomes Using Polymorphism-Aware Models.Genetics · 2019Article
- The Impact of Natural Selection on Short Insertion and Deletion Variation in the Great Tit Genome.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Influence of Recombination and GC-biased Gene Conversion on the Adaptive and Nonadaptive Substitution Rate in Mammals versus Birds.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- GC-biased gene conversion conceals the prediction of the nearly neutral theory in avian genomes.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population genetic theory predicts that selection should be more effective when the effective population size (Ne) is larger, and that the efficacy of selection should correlate positively with recombination rate. Here, we analyzed the genomes of ten great tits and ten zebra finches. Nucleotide diversity at 4-fold degenerate sites indicates that zebra finches have a 2.83-fold larger Ne. We obtained clear evidence that purifying selection is more effective in zebra finches. The proportion of substitutions at 0-fold degenerate sites fixed by positive selection (α) is high in both species (great tit 48%; zebra finch 64%) and is significantly higher in zebra finches. When α was estimated on GC-conservative changes (i.e., between A and T and between G and C), the estimates reduced in both species (great tit 22%; zebra finch 53%). A theoretical model presented herein suggests that failing to control for the effects of GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is potentially a contributor to the overestimation of α, and that this effect cannot be alleviated by first fitting a demographic model to neutral variants. We present the first estimates in birds for α in the untranslated regions, and found evidence for substantial adaptive changes. Finally, although purifying selection is stronger in high-recombination regions, we obtained mixed evidence for α increasing with recombination rate, especially after accounting for gBGC. These results highlight that it is important to consider the potential confounding effects of gBGC when quantifying selection and that our understanding of what determines the efficacy of selection is incomplete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.