Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29045463›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Submillisievert standard-pitch CT pulmonary angiography with ultra-low dose contrast media administration: A comparison to standard CT imaging.

Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam, Christian Mikat, Elena Stenzel, Youssef Erfanian, Axel Wetter, Thomas Schlosser, Michael Forsting, Kai Nassenstein

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saravanabavaan SuntharalingamDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-7856
Christian MikatDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Elena StenzelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Youssef ErfanianDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Axel WetterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas SchlosserDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Michael ForstingDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Kai NassensteinDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of submillisievert standard-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with ultra-low dose contrast media administration in comparison to standard CTPA. MATERIALS AND

methodsHundred patients (56 females, 44 males, mean age 69.6±15.4 years; median BMI: 26.6, IQR: 5.9) with suspected pulmonary embolism were examined with two different protocols (n = 50 each, group A: 80 kVp, ref. mAs 115, 25 ml of contrast medium; group B: 100 kVp, ref. mAs 150, 60 ml of contrast medium) using a dual-source CT equipped with automated exposure control. Objective and subjective image qualities, radiation exposure as well as the frequency of pulmonary embolism were evaluated.

resultsThere was no significant difference in subjective image quality scores between two groups regarding pulmonary arteries (p = 0.776), whereby the interobserver agreement was excellent (group A: k = 0.9; group B k = 1.0). Objective image analysis revealed that signal intensities (SI), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the pulmonary arteries were equal or significantly higher in group B. There was no significant difference in the frequency of pulmonary embolism (p = 0.65). Using the low dose and low contrast media protocol resulted in a radiation dose reduction by 71.8% (2.4 vs. 0.7 mSv; p<0.001).

conclusionsThis 80 kVp standard pitch CTPA protocol with 25 ml contrast agent volume can obtain sufficient image quality to exclude or diagnose pulmonary emboli while reducing radiation dose by approximately 71%.

Indexed as

AgedAortaComputed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansLungMalePulmonary ArteryPulmonary EmbolismRadiation ExposureRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReference StandardsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID29045463
PMCPMC5646863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.