Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29045452›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2017

Prospective, multicenter French study evaluating the clinical impact of the Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype-Prosigna® Test in the management of early-stage breast cancers.

Delphine Hequet, Céline Callens, David Gentien, Benoit Albaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Coraline Dubot, Paul Cottu, Cyrille Huchon, Sonia Zilberman, Helene Berseneff and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prosigna test in breast cancer: real-life experience.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021
    Article
  10. Concordance between results of inexpensive statistical models and multigene signatures in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Delphine HequetDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie-Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-5651
Céline CallensDepartment of Pharmacogenomics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
David GentienInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Genomic platform, Paris, France.
Benoit AlbaudInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Genomic platform, Paris, France.
Marie-Ange Mouret-ReynierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Coraline DubotDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie-Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France.
Paul CottuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie-Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France.
Cyrille HuchonDepartment of Gynecology, Poissy-St Germain hospital, Poissy, France.
Sonia ZilbermanDepartment of Gynecology, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Helene BerseneffDepartment of Gynecology, René Dubos Hospital, Pontoise, France.
Cyril FoaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Private Hospital Clairval, Marseille, France.
Rémy SalmonDepartment of Surgery, Private Hospital Les Peupliers, Paris, France.
Aurélie RoulotDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie-Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France.
Florence LereboursDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie-Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France.
Anne SalomonDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie-Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France.
Nadeem GhaliNanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Pascale MorelNanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Qianyi LiCedar Associates LLC, Menlo Park, CA, United States of America.
Anne CayreDepartment of Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin-UMR INSERM 1240, University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean-Marc GuinebretièreDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie-Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France.
John HornbergerNanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Frédérique Penault-LlorcaDepartment of Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin-UMR INSERM 1240, University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Roman RouzierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie-Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France.
Hôpital René Huguenin · FRInserm · FRNanostring Technologies (United States) · USUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRCentre Hospitalier René-Dubos · FRCentre Jean Perrin · FRHôpital privé Clairval · FRInstitut Curie · FRRamsay Santé Hôpital privé des Peupliers · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Prosigna® breast cancer prognostic gene signature assay identifies a gene-expression profile that permits the classification of tumors into subtypes and gives a score for the risk of recurrence (ROR) at 10 years. The primary objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate the impact of Prosigna's assay information on physicians' adjuvant treatment decisions in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Secondary objectives were to assess confidence of practitioners in their therapeutic recommendations before and after the added information provided by the Prosigna assay; and to evaluate the emotional state of patients before and after the Prosigna test results.

methodsConsecutive patients with invasive early-stage breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicenter study carried out in 8 hospitals in France. The Prosigna test was carried out on surgical specimens using the nCounter® Analysis System located at the Institut Curie. Both before and after receiving the Prosigna test results, physicians completed treatment confidence questionnaires and patients completed questionnaires concerning their state of anxiety, the difficulties felt in face of the therapy and quality of life. Information was also collected at 6 months regarding the physicians' opinion on the test results and the patients' degree of anxiety, difficulties with therapy and quality of life.

resultsBetween March 2015 and January 2016, 8 study centers in France consecutively enrolled 210 postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth hormone-2 (HER-2) negative, and node negative tumors, either stage 1 or stage 2. Intrinsic tumor subtypes as assessed by the Prosigna test were 114 (58.2%) Luminal A, 79 (40.3%) Luminal B, 1 (0.5%) HER-2 enriched (HER-2E), and 2 (1.0%) basal-like. Before receiving the Prosigna test results, physicians categorized tumor subtypes based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) as Luminal A in 126 (64%) patients and Luminal B in 70 (36%) patients, an overall discordance rate of 25%. The availability of Prosigna assay results was significantly associated with the likelihood of change in treatment recommendations, with 34 patients (18%) having their treatment plan changed from Adjuvant Chemotherapy to No Adjuvant Chemotherapy or vice versa (p<0.001, Fisher's exact test). Prosigna test results also decreased patients' anxiety about the chosen adjuvant therapy, and improved emotional well-being and measures of personal perceptions of uncertainty.

conclusionsThe results of this prospective decision impact study are consistent with 2 previous, identically designed studies carried out in Spain and Germany. The availability of Prosigna test results increased the confidence of treating physicians in their adjuvant treatment decisions, and led to an 18% change in chemotherapy treatment plan (from Adjuvant Chemotherapy to No Adjuvant Chemotherapy or vice versa). Prosigna testing decreased anxiety and improved measures of health-related quality of life in patients facing adjuvant therapy. The 25% discordance between Prosigna test and IHC subtyping underlines the importance of molecular testing for optimal systemic therapy indications in early breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFranceHealth Planning GuidelinesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPhysiciansProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29045452
PMCPMC5646764
OpenAlexW2765744530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.