Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29045233›Full record

ReviewRadiology2017

The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Sadhna Verma, Peter L Choyke, Steven C Eberhardt, Aytekin Oto, Clare M Tempany, Baris Turkbey, Andrew B Rosenkrantz

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03936127 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of a Novel Transperineal Targeted Fusion Biopsy System to Conventional Transrectal Targeted Fusion Biopsy for Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers and to Eliminate Post-procedure Related Infections: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Nicola SchiedaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled360ConditionsProstate CancerArmsUltrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy
NCT05382182 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Outcome Of Treatment Of Prostate Cancer at Sohag University Hospital Between 2017 to 2021

TypeobservationalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsProstate CancerArmsandrogen deprivation therapy, external beam radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [MR-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy from Radiologists' Perspective].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Yield of second-round MRI targeted ultrasound-guided fusion prostate biopsy after initial first-round targeted biopsy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. MR fingerprinting of the prostate.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Modeling and Operator Control of a Robotic Tool for Bidirectional Manipulation in Targeted Prostate Biopsy.... International Symposium on Medical Robotics. International Symposium on Medical Robotics · 2022
    Article
  20. False-positive mpMRI and true-negativeTranslational andrology and urology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sadhna VermaFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.).
Peter L ChoykeFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.).
Steven C EberhardtFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.).
Aytekin OtoFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.).
Clare M TempanyFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.).
Baris TurkbeyFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.).
Andrew B RosenkrantzFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.).
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USNYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy is the standard approach for histopathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, this technique has multiple limitations because of its inability to accurately visualize and target prostate lesions. Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the prostate is more reliably able to localize significant prostate cancer. Targeted prostate biopsy by using MR imaging may thus help to reduce false-negative results and improve risk assessment. Several commercial devices are now available for targeted prostate biopsy, including in-gantry MR imaging-targeted biopsy and real-time transrectal US-MR imaging fusion biopsy systems. This article reviews the current status of MR imaging-targeted biopsy platforms, including technical considerations, as well as advantages and challenges of each technique.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedHumansMaleMultimodal ImagingProstateProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID29045233
PMCPMC5673043
OpenAlexW2765659259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.