Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29045078›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2018

Skin tears and risk factors assessment: a systematic review on evidence-based medicine.

Raffaele Serra, Nicola Ielapi, Andrea Barbetta, Stefano de Franciscis

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04513405 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Role of Estrogens and Their Receptors in the Development of Skin Tears Evaluated in Residents of Residential Care Facilities.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CatanzaroRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,200ConditionsSkin Tear, Estrogen DeficiencyArmsBlood sampling, Shave Biopsy
NCT06462690 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Care Provided with Skin Care Protocol on Skin Moisture Change, Dermatological Quality of Life and Patient Comfort in Elderly Patients: Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuygu AKÇARan2024 to 2024Enrolled42ConditionsElderly Person, Comfort, Quality of Life, Skin MoistureArmspre-mid-post test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Skin Tear Treatment withPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raffaele SerraInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology (CIFL), International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Nicola IelapiInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology (CIFL), International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Andrea BarbettaInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology (CIFL), International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Stefano de FranciscisInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology (CIFL), International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin tears represent a common condition of traumatic wounds, which may be encountered in some categories of individuals at the extremes of age, such as infants and the elderly. Despite the high prevalence and cost of these lesions, there has been little investigation into the risk factors that lead to this condition. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate the main risk factors involved in development of skin tears. We planned to include all the studies dealing with risk factors related to skin tears. Only publications in English were considered. We excluded all the studies that did not properly fit our research question and those with insufficient data. Of the 166 records found, 24 matched our inclusion criteria. After reading the full-text articles, we decided to exclude seven articles because of the following reasons: (1) not responding properly to our research questions and (2) insufficient data; the final set included 17 articles. From a literature search, we found the following main issues related to risk factors, which have been described in detail in this section: age-related skin changes, dehydration, malnutrition, sensory changes, mobility impairment, pharmacological therapies and mechanical factors related to skin care practices. Our findings clearly show that in frail populations (especially infant and elderly), the stratification risk, as a primary prevention strategy, is an effective tool in avoiding the development of chronic wounds. The development and the implementation of prevention strategies based on appropriate knowledge of the risk factors involved and the adoption of correct techniques during skin care practices could reduce or even avoid the onset of skin tears.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDermatologyEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLacerationsMaleRisk FactorsSkinWounds and InjuriesElderlyEvidence-based medicineInfantsRisk factorSkin tear

Identifiers

PMID29045078
PMCPMC7950130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.