SynthesisInternational wound journal2018
Skin tears and risk factors assessment: a systematic review on evidence-based medicine.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Role of Estrogens and Their Receptors in the Development of Skin Tears Evaluated in Residents of Residential Care Facilities.
Effect of Care Provided with Skin Care Protocol on Skin Moisture Change, Dermatological Quality of Life and Patient Comfort in Elderly Patients: Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk factors for skin tears in the older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of bed bath methods for skin integrity, skin cleanliness and comfort enhancement in adults: A systematic review.Nursing open · 2021Pooled it
- Haemorrhage from varicose veins and varicose ulceration: A systematic review.International wound journal · 2018Pooled it
- Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2023Trial
- Development and Validation of the Content of a Mobile Digital Board-Game Application, Constituting a Playful Tool for the Management of Friction Injuries.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Knowledge gaps in pressure injury, medical device-related pressure injury, and skin tear among intensive care unit nurses.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- A nomogram model for predicting risk factors and the outcome of skin ulcer.Annals of medicine · 2025Observational
- Educational Interventions to Improve Knowledge Among Nurses in the Prevention of Skin Tears in Hospitalised Adults and Older Adults: A Scoping Review.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Development of a multivariable prognostic prediction model for skin tears in older nursing home residents.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Knowledge status of skin tear prevention and its demographic and occupational influencing factors: A National cross-sectional survey among nurses.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Herbal medicine in chronic wounds in Calabria region of Italy: an ethnographic study.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Skin Tear Treatment withPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [Skin aging and dermatoporosis-the chronic skin fragility syndrome].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Risk factors of skin tear in older persons: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The Turkish version of the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES): Validity and reliability study.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Extensive skin laceration on the forearm due to closed reduction of a dislocated shoulder. A case report.Trauma case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Risk Factors for Bleeding Varicose Veins in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Translation and validation: standard Chinese version of the skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES).Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin tears represent a common condition of traumatic wounds, which may be encountered in some categories of individuals at the extremes of age, such as infants and the elderly. Despite the high prevalence and cost of these lesions, there has been little investigation into the risk factors that lead to this condition. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate the main risk factors involved in development of skin tears. We planned to include all the studies dealing with risk factors related to skin tears. Only publications in English were considered. We excluded all the studies that did not properly fit our research question and those with insufficient data. Of the 166 records found, 24 matched our inclusion criteria. After reading the full-text articles, we decided to exclude seven articles because of the following reasons: (1) not responding properly to our research questions and (2) insufficient data; the final set included 17 articles. From a literature search, we found the following main issues related to risk factors, which have been described in detail in this section: age-related skin changes, dehydration, malnutrition, sensory changes, mobility impairment, pharmacological therapies and mechanical factors related to skin care practices. Our findings clearly show that in frail populations (especially infant and elderly), the stratification risk, as a primary prevention strategy, is an effective tool in avoiding the development of chronic wounds. The development and the implementation of prevention strategies based on appropriate knowledge of the risk factors involved and the adoption of correct techniques during skin care practices could reduce or even avoid the onset of skin tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.