Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29044248›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Task demands, tDCS intensity, and the COMT val

Jaclyn A Stephens, Kevin T Jones, Marian E Berryhill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaclyn A StephensUniversity of Nevada, Department of Psychology, Program in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA. Jaclyn.Stephens@ColoState.edu.
Kevin T JonesUniversity of Nevada, Department of Psychology, Program in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Marian E BerryhillUniversity of Nevada, Department of Psychology, Program in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
University of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Research Training in Rehabilitation for Brain Injury and Neurological DisabilityT32HD007414 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Amy J. Bastian · 1991 to 2026
$6.3M
Investigating Working Memory Encoding using Frequency-Tagging of Evoked ResponseR15EY022775 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI BERRYHILL, MARIAN E, CAPLOVITZ, GIDEON PAUL · 2012 to 2012
$407k
NEI NIH HHS R15 EY022775NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007414NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) training paired with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve executive function in older adults. The unclear mechanism of tDCS likely depends on tDCS intensity, and task relevant genetic factors (e.g., for WM: COMT val

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionLearningMemory, Short-TermPolymorphism, GeneticTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAgedAnalysis of VarianceCatechol O-MethyltransferaseFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29044248
PMCPMC5647397
OpenAlexW2764096619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.