Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29044205›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Gender Differences in Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness Under Social Pressure.

Li Zheng, Reipeng Ning, Lin Li, Chunli Wei, Xuemei Cheng, Chu Zhou, Xiuyan Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Li ZhengSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Reipeng NingShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Lin LiSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Chunli WeiSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Xuemei ChengCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Beijing Polytechnic, Beijing, China.
Chu ZhouDepartment of Psychology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zhouchu@fudan.edu.cn.
Xiuyan GuoSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. xyguo@psy.ecnu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have revealed the key role of social pressure on individuals' decision-making processes. However, the impact of social pressure on unfairness-related decision-making processes remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated how social pressure modulated men's and women's responses in an ultimatum game. Twenty women and eighteen men played the ultimatum game as responders in the scanner, where fair and unfair offers were tendered by proposers acting alone (low pressure) or by proposers endorsed by three supporters (high pressure). Results showed that men rejected more, whereas women accepted more unfair offers in the high versus low pressure context. Neurally, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex activation in women positively predicted their acceptance rate difference between contexts. In men, stronger right anterior insula activation and increased connectivity between right anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex were observed when they receiving unfair offers in the high than low pressure context. Furthermore, more bilateral anterior insula and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activations were found when men rejected (relative to accepted) unfair offers in the high than low pressure context. These findings highlighted gender differences in the modulation of behavioral and neural responses to unfairness by social pressure.

Indexed as

AttitudeDecision MakingPeer InfluenceCerebral CortexConnectomeFemaleHumansMaleRejection, PsychologySex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29044205
PMCPMC5647364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.