Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29044203›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Neomorphosis and heterochrony of skull shape in dog domestication.

Madeleine Geiger, Allowen Evin, Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra, Dominic Gascho, Cornelia Mainini, Christoph P E Zollikofer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Australasian dingo archetype:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cranial shape variation in domestication: A pilot study on the case of rabbits.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Australian dingo: untamed or feral?Frontiers in zoology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Pandora's box.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Madeleine GeigerPaläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Karl-Schmid-Strasse 4, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland. madeleine.geiger87@gmail.com.
Allowen EvinInstitut des Sciences de l'Évolution - Montpellier, UMR 5554 CNRS, Université de Montpellier, EPHE, IRD 226, Cirad 2, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, cedex 05, France. allowen.evin@umontpellier.fr.
Marcelo R Sánchez-VillagraPaläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Karl-Schmid-Strasse 4, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominic GaschoInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190/52, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cornelia MaininiTierpark Bern, Dählhölzli & Bärenpark, Tierparkweg 1, 3005, Bern, Switzerland.
Christoph P E ZollikoferAnthropologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overall similarity of the skull shape of some dog breeds with that of juvenile wolves begs the question if and how ontogenetic changes such as paedomorphosis (evolutionary juvenilisation) played a role in domestication. Here we test for changes in patterns of development and growth during dog domestication. We present the first geometric morphometric study using ontogenetic series of dog and wolf crania, and samples of dogs with relatively ancestral morphology and from different time periods. We show that patterns of juvenile-to-adult morphological change are largely similar in wolves and domestic dogs, but differ in two ways. First, dog skulls show unique (neomorphic) features already shortly after birth, and these features persist throughout postnatal ontogeny. Second, at any given age, juvenile dogs exhibit skull shapes that resemble those of consistently younger wolves, even in dog breeds that do not exhibit a 'juvenilized' morphology as adults. These patterns exemplify the complex nature of evolutionary changes during dog domestication: the cranial morphology of adult dogs cannot simply be explained as either neomorphic or paedomorphic. The key to our understanding of dog domestication may lie in a closer comparative examination of developmental phases.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDomesticationAnimalsBreedingDogsPhenotypePhylogenySkullWolves

Identifiers

PMID29044203
PMCPMC5647425
OpenAlexW2762859763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.