ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2018
Analyzing Genome Rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Both genome instability and replicative senescence stem from the shortest telomere in telomerase-negative cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Spontaneous and environment induced genomic alterations in yeast model.Cell insight · 2025Review
- Identification of different classes of genome instability suppressor genes through analysis of DNA damage response markers.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Mechanisms underlying genome instability mediated by formation of foldback inversions ineLife · 2020Article
- Article
- Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: Cellular assays of DNA repair pathways.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2019Review
- TheThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
- The Swr1 chromatin-remodeling complex prevents genome instability induced by replication fork progression defects.Nature communications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome rearrangements underlie different human diseases including many cancers. Determining the rates at which genome rearrangements arise and isolating unique, independent genome rearrangements is critical to understanding the genes and pathways that prevent or promote genome rearrangements. Here, we describe quantitative S. cerevisiae genetic assays for measuring the rates of accumulating genome rearrangements including deletions, translocations, and broken chromosomes healed by de novo telomere addition that result in the deletion of two counter-selectable genes, CAN1 and URA3, placed in the nonessential regions of the S. cerevisiae genome. The assays also allow for the isolation of individual genome rearrangements for structural studies, and a method for analyzing genome rearrangements by next-generation DNA sequencing is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.